PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RFDA vs. IQM
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

RFDA vs. IQM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA) and Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

RFDA vs. IQM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
RFDA
RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF
-1.05%16.42%20.12%16.98%-8.58%25.94%21.44%
IQM
Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF
1.18%30.76%31.03%41.06%-33.36%25.18%78.48%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RFDA achieves a -1.05% return, which is significantly lower than IQM's 1.18% return.


RFDA

1D
1.86%
1M
-1.50%
YTD
-1.05%
6M
0.65%
1Y
20.44%
3Y*
16.13%
5Y*
11.66%
10Y*

IQM

1D
6.12%
1M
-5.61%
YTD
1.18%
6M
1.33%
1Y
55.72%
3Y*
26.13%
5Y*
14.95%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


RFDA vs. IQM - Expense Ratio Comparison

RFDA has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than IQM's 0.50% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

RFDA vs. IQM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RFDA
RFDA Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
RFDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RFDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
RFDA Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
RFDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
RFDA Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

IQM
IQM Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
IQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
IQM Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
IQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
IQM Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RFDA vs. IQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA) and Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RFDAIQMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.16

1.68

-0.52

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.70

2.29

-0.58

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.32

-0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.66

3.72

-2.06

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.46

11.65

-3.18

RFDA vs. IQM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RFDA Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is lower than the IQM Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RFDA and IQM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RFDAIQMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.16

1.68

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

0.52

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

0.77

-0.05

Correlation

The correlation between RFDA and IQM is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

RFDA vs. IQM - Dividend Comparison

RFDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%, while IQM has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
RFDA
RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF
1.99%1.89%2.23%2.68%3.57%1.44%1.62%1.87%2.44%1.90%0.98%
IQM
Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.17%0.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

RFDA vs. IQM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RFDA drawdown since its inception was -34.60%, smaller than the maximum IQM drawdown of -44.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFDA and IQM.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


RFDAIQMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.60%

-44.91%

+10.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.73%

-14.71%

+1.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.35%

-44.91%

+25.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.62%

-8.68%

+5.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.80%

-12.55%

+8.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.49%

4.70%

-2.21%

Volatility

RFDA vs. IQM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA) is 4.32%, while Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM) has a volatility of 12.90%. This indicates that RFDA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


RFDAIQMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.32%

12.90%

-8.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.90%

23.48%

-14.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.70%

33.37%

-15.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.73%

28.67%

-12.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.93%

30.73%

-13.80%