RESM vs. VTWO
RESM (Columbia Research Enhanced Small Cap ETF) and VTWO (Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds - RESM tracks the Beta Advantage Research Enhanced Small Cap Index while VTWO tracks the Russell 2000 Index. Both are passively managed. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. RESM charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for VTWO.
Performance
RESM vs. VTWO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RESM achieves a 21.93% return, which is significantly higher than VTWO's 20.72% return.
RESM
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- 3.11%
- 6M
- 15.03%
- YTD
- 21.93%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VTWO
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 1.27%
- 6M
- 11.97%
- YTD
- 20.72%
- 1Y
- 35.48%
- 3Y*
- 16.75%
- 5Y*
- 8.09%
- 10Y*
- 10.97%
RESM vs. VTWO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RESM Columbia Research Enhanced Small Cap ETF | 21.93% | -3.32% |
VTWO Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF | 20.72% | -3.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between RESM and VTWO is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025 | 0.95 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RESM vs. VTWO — Risk / Return Rank
RESM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
VTWO
RESM vs. VTWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Research Enhanced Small Cap ETF (RESM) and Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF (VTWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RESM | VTWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.31 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.24 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 11.47 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RESM vs. VTWO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RESM drawdown since its inception was -8.50%, smaller than the maximum VTWO drawdown of -41.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RESM and VTWO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RESM | VTWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.50% | -41.19% | +32.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.99% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -27.57% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -31.88% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.19% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.74% | -1.56% | +0.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.73% | -8.33% | +6.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.10% | — |
Volatility
RESM vs. VTWO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RESM | VTWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.76% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 14.16% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.01% | 19.35% | -2.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.01% | 22.50% | -5.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.01% | 23.04% | -6.03% |
RESM vs. VTWO - Expense Ratio Comparison
RESM has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is higher than VTWO's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
RESM vs. VTWO - Dividend Comparison
RESM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%, less than VTWO's 1.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RESM Columbia Research Enhanced Small Cap ETF | 0.08% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VTWO Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF | 1.10% | 1.25% | 1.21% | 1.45% | 1.48% | 1.13% | 0.92% | 1.36% | 1.41% | 1.18% | 1.27% | 1.23% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, RESM and VTWO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, VTWO is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VTWO is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for RESM.
VTWO has the higher dividend yield at 1.10%, compared with 0.08% for RESM.
RESM tracks Beta Advantage Research Enhanced Small Cap Index, while VTWO tracks Russell 2000 Index. They also come from different issuers: Columbia Threadneedle and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for RESM and 0.06% for VTWO.
Find the right allocation for RESM and VTWO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer