PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RESM vs. VTWO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RESM vs. VTWO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Research Enhanced Small Cap ETF (RESM) and Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF (VTWO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RESM achieves a 21.93% return, which is significantly higher than VTWO's 20.72% return.


RESM

1D
0.23%
1M
3.11%
6M
15.03%
YTD
21.93%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VTWO

1D
-0.05%
1M
1.27%
6M
11.97%
YTD
20.72%
1Y
35.48%
3Y*
16.75%
5Y*
8.09%
10Y*
10.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RESM vs. VTWO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
RESM
Columbia Research Enhanced Small Cap ETF
21.93%-3.32%
VTWO
Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF
20.72%-3.03%

Correlation

The correlation between RESM and VTWO is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025

0.95

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RESM vs. VTWO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RESM

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


VTWO
VTWO Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
VTWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTWO Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
VTWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTWO Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RESM vs. VTWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Research Enhanced Small Cap ETF (RESM) and Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF (VTWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RESMVTWODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.47

RESM vs. VTWO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RESM vs. VTWO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RESM drawdown since its inception was -8.50%, smaller than the maximum VTWO drawdown of -41.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RESM and VTWO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RESMVTWODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.50%

-41.19%

+32.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.74%

-1.56%

+0.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.73%

-8.33%

+6.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.10%

Volatility

RESM vs. VTWO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RESMVTWODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.01%

19.35%

-2.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.01%

22.50%

-5.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.01%

23.04%

-6.03%

RESM vs. VTWO - Expense Ratio Comparison

RESM has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is higher than VTWO's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

RESM vs. VTWO - Dividend Comparison

RESM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%, less than VTWO's 1.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RESM
Columbia Research Enhanced Small Cap ETF
0.08%0.09%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VTWO
Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF
1.10%1.25%1.21%1.45%1.48%1.13%0.92%1.36%1.41%1.18%1.27%1.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, RESM and VTWO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, VTWO is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VTWO is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for RESM.

VTWO has the higher dividend yield at 1.10%, compared with 0.08% for RESM.

RESM tracks Beta Advantage Research Enhanced Small Cap Index, while VTWO tracks Russell 2000 Index. They also come from different issuers: Columbia Threadneedle and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for RESM and 0.06% for VTWO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RESM and VTWO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer