PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RESM vs. REGS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RESM vs. REGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Research Enhanced Small Cap ETF (RESM) and Columbia Large Cap Growth ETF (REGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


RESM

1D
-0.58%
1M
5.32%
6M
21.06%
YTD
21.67%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

REGS

1D
-1.06%
1M
-4.44%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RESM vs. REGS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between RESM and REGS is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 16, 2026

0.62

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Columbia Large Cap Growth ETF

Return for Risk

RESM vs. REGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Research Enhanced Small Cap ETF (RESM) and Columbia Large Cap Growth ETF (REGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

RESM vs. REGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RESM vs. REGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RESM drawdown since its inception was -8.50%, which is greater than REGS's maximum drawdown of -7.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RESM and REGS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RESMREGSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.50%

-7.59%

-0.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.95%

-5.84%

+4.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.77%

-2.22%

+0.45%

Volatility

RESM vs. REGS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RESMREGSDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.36%

20.25%

-2.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.36%

20.25%

-2.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.36%

20.25%

-2.89%

RESM vs. REGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

RESM has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than REGS's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

RESM vs. REGS - Dividend Comparison

RESM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%, while REGS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


RESM and REGS have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, RESM is cheaper at 0.32% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

RESM is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for REGS.

RESM has the higher dividend yield at 0.08%, compared with 0.00% for REGS.

RESM is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while REGS is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for RESM and 0.35% for REGS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RESM and REGS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer