PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
REMX vs. CRML
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

REMX vs. CRML - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF (REMX) and Critical Metals Corp (CRML). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

REMX vs. CRML - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
REMX
VanEck Vectors Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF
19.05%92.95%-19.51%
CRML
Critical Metals Corp
14.41%2.21%-69.82%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, REMX achieves a 19.05% return, which is significantly higher than CRML's 14.41% return.


REMX

1D
2.95%
1M
-11.88%
YTD
19.05%
6M
36.14%
1Y
126.68%
3Y*
4.04%
5Y*
5.20%
10Y*
10.24%

CRML

1D
19.04%
1M
-21.77%
YTD
14.41%
6M
27.65%
1Y
471.22%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

REMX vs. CRML — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

REMX
REMX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
REMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
REMX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
REMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
REMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

CRML
CRML Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
CRML Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRML Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRML Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
CRML Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRML Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

REMX vs. CRML - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF (REMX) and Critical Metals Corp (CRML). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


REMXCRMLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.65

2.67

-0.03

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.08

3.53

-0.45

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.38

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.10

6.01

-0.90

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.16

9.99

+5.17

REMX vs. CRML - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current REMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.65, which is comparable to the CRML Sharpe Ratio of 2.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of REMX and CRML, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


REMXCRMLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.65

2.67

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.10

-0.25

+0.15

Correlation

The correlation between REMX and CRML is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

REMX vs. CRML - Dividend Comparison

REMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%, while CRML has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
REMX
VanEck Vectors Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF
1.48%1.76%2.56%0.00%1.56%5.25%0.81%1.64%12.43%2.89%2.23%4.77%
CRML
Critical Metals Corp
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

REMX vs. CRML - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REMX drawdown since its inception was -90.20%, roughly equal to the maximum CRML drawdown of -93.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REMX and CRML.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


REMXCRMLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.20%

-93.91%

+3.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.35%

-77.74%

+54.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-73.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-73.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-59.70%

-73.51%

+13.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-67.01%

-68.66%

+1.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.86%

46.77%

-38.91%

Volatility

REMX vs. CRML - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Vectors Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF (REMX) is 17.39%, while Critical Metals Corp (CRML) has a volatility of 31.02%. This indicates that REMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRML based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


REMXCRMLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.39%

31.02%

-13.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

37.90%

124.55%

-86.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

48.30%

177.77%

-129.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.76%

158.24%

-118.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.61%

158.24%

-121.63%