REGS vs. SPYG

Last updated Jul 4, 2026

REGS (Columbia Large Cap Growth ETF) and SPYG (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - REGS is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Columbia Threadneedle, while SPYG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Growth Index. REGS is actively managed, while SPYG is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. REGS charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SPYG.

Performance

REGS vs. SPYG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Large Cap Growth ETF (REGS) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

REGS

• 1D: -1.06%
• 1M: -4.44%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SPYG

• 1D: -1.05%
• 1M: -3.19%
• 6M: 10.07%
• YTD: 10.12%
• 1Y: 22.65%
• 3Y*: 25.15%
• 5Y*: 13.77%
• 10Y*: 17.82%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

REGS vs. SPYG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
REGS Columbia Large Cap Growth ETF	9.85%
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF	16.23%

Correlation

The correlation between REGS and SPYG is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 16, 2026	0.94

Return for Risk

REGS vs. SPYG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

REGS

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SPYG

SPYG Risk / Return Rank: 45
SPYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
SPYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
SPYG Omega Ratio Rank: 45
SPYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
SPYG Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

REGS vs. SPYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Large Cap Growth ETF (REGS) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	REGS	SPYG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.39	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.96	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.25	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.75	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	6.77	—

Drawdowns

REGS vs. SPYG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REGS drawdown since its inception was -7.59%, smaller than the maximum SPYG drawdown of -67.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REGS and SPYG.

Drawdown Indicators

	REGS	SPYG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.59%	-67.63%	+60.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-13.76%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-22.14%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-32.67%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-32.67%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.84%	-4.29%	-1.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.22%	-24.26%	+22.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.55%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	REGS	SPYG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	7.60%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	14.12%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.25%	17.35%	+2.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.25%	21.39%	-1.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.25%	20.72%	-0.47%

REGS vs. SPYG - Expense Ratio Comparison

REGS has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYG's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

REGS vs. SPYG - Dividend Comparison

REGS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
REGS Columbia Large Cap Growth ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF	0.49%	0.52%	0.60%	1.15%	1.03%	0.62%	0.90%	1.37%	1.51%	1.41%	1.55%	1.57%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both REGS and SPYG in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, REGS and SPYG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, REGS or SPYG?

On fees, SPYG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, REGS or SPYG?

SPYG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for REGS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, REGS or SPYG?

SPYG has the higher dividend yield at 0.49%, compared with 0.00% for REGS.

What is the main difference between REGS and SPYG?

REGS is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SPYG is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Columbia Threadneedle and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for REGS and 0.04% for SPYG.