REGL vs. TMVE
REGL (ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF) and TMVE (Thrivent Mid Cap Value ETF) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds - REGL tracks the S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats Index while TMVE tracks the Actively Managed. Both are passively managed. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. REGL charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for TMVE.
Performance
REGL vs. TMVE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, REGL achieves a 8.22% return, which is significantly lower than TMVE's 17.39% return.
REGL
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- 1.92%
- YTD
- 8.22%
- 6M
- 6.56%
- 1Y
- 13.68%
- 3Y*
- 12.57%
- 5Y*
- 7.41%
- 10Y*
- 9.68%
TMVE
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- 3.25%
- YTD
- 17.39%
- 6M
- 16.23%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
REGL vs. TMVE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
REGL ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 8.22% | 2.73% |
TMVE Thrivent Mid Cap Value ETF | 17.39% | 6.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between REGL and TMVE is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025 | 0.80 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
REGL vs. TMVE — Risk / Return Rank
REGL
TMVE
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
REGL vs. TMVE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (REGL) and Thrivent Mid Cap Value ETF (TMVE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| REGL | TMVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.42 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.41 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
REGL vs. TMVE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum REGL drawdown since its inception was -36.37%, which is greater than TMVE's maximum drawdown of -8.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REGL and TMVE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| REGL | TMVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.37% | -8.21% | -28.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.67% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.96% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.96% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.37% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.97% | -0.69% | -1.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.08% | -1.43% | -2.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.11% | — | — |
Volatility
REGL vs. TMVE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| REGL | TMVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.57% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.31% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.24% | 13.81% | -0.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.06% | 13.81% | +2.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.32% | 13.81% | +4.51% |
REGL vs. TMVE - Expense Ratio Comparison
REGL has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than TMVE's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
REGL vs. TMVE - Dividend Comparison
REGL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.15%, more than TMVE's 0.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
REGL ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 2.15% | 2.32% | 2.28% | 2.40% | 2.32% | 2.50% | 2.41% | 1.96% | 2.09% | 1.63% | 1.20% | 1.66% |
TMVE Thrivent Mid Cap Value ETF | 0.10% | 0.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
REGL and TMVE have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, REGL is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
REGL is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for TMVE.
REGL has the higher dividend yield at 2.15%, compared with 0.10% for TMVE.
REGL tracks S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats Index, while TMVE tracks Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Thrivent. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for REGL and 0.55% for TMVE.
Find the right allocation for REGL and TMVE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer