REGL vs. TBG

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

REGL (ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF) and TBG (TBG Dividend Focus ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - REGL is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats Index, while TBG is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by TBG. REGL is passively managed, while TBG is actively managed. Over the past year, REGL returned 18.69% vs 21.75% for TBG. Their 0.80 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. REGL charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for TBG.

Performance

REGL vs. TBG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (REGL) and TBG Dividend Focus ETF (TBG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, REGL achieves a 13.59% return, which is significantly lower than TBG's 15.96% return.

REGL

• 1D: 0.94%
• 1M: 2.48%
• 6M: 7.93%
• YTD: 13.59%
• 1Y: 18.69%
• 3Y*: 12.39%
• 5Y*: 8.56%
• 10Y*: 9.68%
• ALL TIME*: 10.08%

TBG

• 1D: 0.32%
• 1M: 2.38%
• 6M: 9.04%
• YTD: 15.96%
• 1Y: 21.75%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 19.98%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
REGL ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF	$11.70M	$8.88M	$5.98M
TBG TBG Dividend Focus ETF	$980.55K	$1.02M	$886.99K

REGL vs. TBG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
REGL ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF	13.59%	6.89%	12.26%	11.08%
TBG TBG Dividend Focus ETF	15.96%	7.50%	20.58%	9.55%

Correlation

The correlation between REGL and TBG is 0.76, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2023	0.80

The correlation between REGL and TBG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

REGL vs. TBG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	REGL	TBG
Financial Services	32.0%	14.2%
Industrials	15.5%	3.7%
Utilities	13.4%	6.8%
Consumer Cyclical	10.7%	8.2%
Basic Materials	8.7%	1.5%
Real Estate	7.6%	12.8%
Healthcare	4.6%	16.4%
Energy	3.1%	13.1%
Consumer Defensive	2.6%	10.7%
Technology	1.7%	9.3%
Communication Services	-	3.2%

Return for Risk

REGL vs. TBG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

REGL

REGL Risk / Return Rank: 56
REGL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
REGL Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
REGL Omega Ratio Rank: 54
REGL Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
REGL Martin Ratio Rank: 50

TBG

TBG Risk / Return Rank: 86
TBG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
TBG Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
TBG Omega Ratio Rank: 86
TBG Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
TBG Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

REGL vs. TBG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (REGL) and TBG Dividend Focus ETF (TBG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	REGL	TBG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.43	2.23	-0.80
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.20	3.30	-1.11
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.39	-0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.94	3.56	-1.62
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.06	11.05	-4.99

REGL vs. TBG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current REGL Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is lower than the TBG Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of REGL and TBG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

REGL vs. TBG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REGL drawdown since its inception was -36.37%, which is greater than TBG's maximum drawdown of -14.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REGL and TBG.

Drawdown Indicators

	REGL	TBG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.37%	-14.76%	-21.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.67%	-6.13%	-3.54%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.96%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.96%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.37%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.99%	-1.04%	+0.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.05%	-2.03%	-2.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.09%	1.97%	+1.12%

Volatility

REGL vs. TBG - Volatility Comparison

ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (REGL) has a higher volatility of 4.17% compared to TBG Dividend Focus ETF (TBG) at 3.33%. This indicates that REGL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TBG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	REGL	TBG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.17%	3.33%	+0.84%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.55%	7.38%	+2.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.11%	9.81%	+3.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.04%	12.18%	+3.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.32%	12.18%	+6.14%

REGL vs. TBG - Expense Ratio Comparison

REGL has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than TBG's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

REGL vs. TBG - Dividend Comparison

REGL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.15%, less than TBG's 2.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
REGL ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF	2.15%	2.32%	2.28%	2.40%	2.32%	2.50%	2.41%	1.96%	2.09%	1.63%	1.20%	1.66%
TBG TBG Dividend Focus ETF	2.59%	2.80%	2.33%	0.48%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both REGL and TBG in my portfolio?

REGL and TBG have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, REGL or TBG?

REGL has higher volatility (4.17%) compared to TBG (3.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REGL dropped -36.37% vs TBG's -14.76%.

Which ETF is better, REGL or TBG?

On 1-year performance, TBG leads with 21.75% vs 18.69% for REGL. On fees, REGL is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, TBG has been the lower-risk option at 3.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, REGL or TBG?

Over the 1-year period, TBG has performed better with a 21.75% return vs 18.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, REGL or TBG?

REGL is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for TBG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, REGL or TBG?

TBG has the higher dividend yield at 2.59%, compared with 2.15% for REGL.

What is the main difference between REGL and TBG?

REGL is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while TBG is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and TBG. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for REGL and 0.59% for TBG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TBG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.