REGL vs. DXUV
REGL (ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF) and DXUV (Dimensional US Vector Equity ETF) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds. REGL is passively managed, while DXUV is actively managed. Over the past year, REGL returned 9.25% vs 27.35% for DXUV. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. REGL charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for DXUV.
Performance
REGL vs. DXUV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, REGL achieves a 3.98% return, which is significantly lower than DXUV's 10.92% return.
REGL
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- -2.06%
- YTD
- 3.98%
- 6M
- 4.90%
- 1Y
- 9.25%
- 3Y*
- 10.42%
- 5Y*
- 5.92%
- 10Y*
- 9.12%
DXUV
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- 3.66%
- YTD
- 10.92%
- 6M
- 11.46%
- 1Y
- 27.35%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
REGL vs. DXUV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
REGL ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 3.98% | 6.89% | 3.22% |
DXUV Dimensional US Vector Equity ETF | 10.92% | 14.34% | 5.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between REGL and DXUV is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2024 | 0.76 |
The correlation between REGL and DXUV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
REGL vs. DXUV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
REGL
DXUV
Financial Services
Industrials
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Technology
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
REGL
DXUV
Industrials
REGL
DXUV
Utilities
REGL
DXUV
Consumer Cyclical
REGL
DXUV
Basic Materials
REGL
DXUV
Real Estate
REGL
DXUV
Healthcare
REGL
DXUV
Consumer Defensive
REGL
DXUV
Energy
REGL
DXUV
Technology
REGL
DXUV
Communication Services
REGL
-
DXUV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
REGL vs. DXUV — Risk / Return Rank
REGL
DXUV
REGL vs. DXUV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (REGL) and Dimensional US Vector Equity ETF (DXUV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| REGL | DXUV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.38 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.96 | 3.22 | -2.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.07 | 13.10 | -10.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| REGL | DXUV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 | 2.17 | -1.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 1.05 | -0.53 |
Drawdowns
REGL vs. DXUV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum REGL drawdown since its inception was -36.37%, which is greater than DXUV's maximum drawdown of -21.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REGL and DXUV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| REGL | DXUV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.37% | -21.08% | -15.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.67% | -8.53% | -1.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.96% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.96% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.37% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.82% | -0.66% | -5.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.08% | -3.08% | -1.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.02% | 2.09% | +0.93% |
Volatility
REGL vs. DXUV - Volatility Comparison
ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (REGL) has a higher volatility of 3.65% compared to Dimensional US Vector Equity ETF (DXUV) at 2.98%. This indicates that REGL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DXUV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| REGL | DXUV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.65% | 2.98% | +0.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.23% | 8.99% | +0.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.22% | 12.72% | +0.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.11% | 17.31% | -1.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.33% | 17.31% | +1.02% |
REGL vs. DXUV - Expense Ratio Comparison
REGL has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than DXUV's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
REGL vs. DXUV - Dividend Comparison
REGL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.24%, more than DXUV's 0.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DXUV Dimensional US Vector Equity ETF | 0.96% | 1.01% | 0.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
REGL ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 2.24% | 2.32% | 2.28% | 2.40% | 2.32% | 2.50% | 2.41% | 1.96% | 2.09% | 1.63% | 1.20% | 1.66% |
Frequently Asked Questions
REGL and DXUV have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
REGL has higher volatility (3.65%) compared to DXUV (2.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REGL dropped -36.37% vs DXUV's -21.08%.
On 1-year performance, DXUV leads with 27.35% vs 9.25% for REGL. On fees, DXUV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, DXUV has been the lower-risk option at 2.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, DXUV has performed better with a 27.35% return vs 9.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DXUV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for REGL.
REGL has the higher dividend yield at 2.24%, compared with 0.96% for DXUV.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Dimensional. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for REGL and 0.25% for DXUV.
DXUV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for REGL and DXUV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer