PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
REGL vs. DXUV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

REGL vs. DXUV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (REGL) and Dimensional US Vector Equity ETF (DXUV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, REGL achieves a 3.98% return, which is significantly lower than DXUV's 10.92% return.


REGL

1D
-0.58%
1M
-2.06%
YTD
3.98%
6M
4.90%
1Y
9.25%
3Y*
10.42%
5Y*
5.92%
10Y*
9.12%

DXUV

1D
-0.66%
1M
3.66%
YTD
10.92%
6M
11.46%
1Y
27.35%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

REGL vs. DXUV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
REGL
ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
3.98%6.89%3.22%
DXUV
Dimensional US Vector Equity ETF
10.92%14.34%5.00%

Correlation

The correlation between REGL and DXUV is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2024

0.76

The correlation between REGL and DXUV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

REGL vs. DXUV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
REGL
DXUV

Financial Services

30.0%
16.3%

Industrials

15.1%
14.7%

Utilities

14.5%
0.5%

Consumer Cyclical

9.6%
11.4%

Basic Materials

9.3%
3.7%

Real Estate

7.8%
0.4%

Healthcare

4.5%
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

3.8%
5.4%

Energy

3.4%
7.0%

Technology

2.0%
24.2%

Communication Services

-

8.1%

Financial Services

REGL
30.0%
DXUV
16.3%

Industrials

REGL
15.1%
DXUV
14.7%

Utilities

REGL
14.5%
DXUV
0.5%

Consumer Cyclical

REGL
9.6%
DXUV
11.4%

Basic Materials

REGL
9.3%
DXUV
3.7%

Real Estate

REGL
7.8%
DXUV
0.4%

Healthcare

REGL
4.5%
DXUV
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

REGL
3.8%
DXUV
5.4%

Energy

REGL
3.4%
DXUV
7.0%

Technology

REGL
2.0%
DXUV
24.2%

Communication Services

REGL

-

DXUV
8.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

REGL vs. DXUV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

REGL
REGL Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
REGL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REGL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
REGL Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
REGL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
REGL Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

DXUV
DXUV Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
DXUV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DXUV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
DXUV Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
DXUV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
DXUV Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

REGL vs. DXUV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (REGL) and Dimensional US Vector Equity ETF (DXUV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


REGLDXUVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.38

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.96

3.22

-2.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.07

13.10

-10.03

REGL vs. DXUV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current REGL Sharpe Ratio is 0.70, which is lower than the DXUV Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of REGL and DXUV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


REGLDXUVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

2.17

-1.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

1.05

-0.53

Drawdowns

REGL vs. DXUV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REGL drawdown since its inception was -36.37%, which is greater than DXUV's maximum drawdown of -21.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REGL and DXUV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


REGLDXUVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.37%

-21.08%

-15.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.67%

-8.53%

-1.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.82%

-0.66%

-5.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.08%

-3.08%

-1.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.02%

2.09%

+0.93%

Volatility

REGL vs. DXUV - Volatility Comparison

ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (REGL) has a higher volatility of 3.65% compared to Dimensional US Vector Equity ETF (DXUV) at 2.98%. This indicates that REGL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DXUV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


REGLDXUVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.65%

2.98%

+0.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.23%

8.99%

+0.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.22%

12.72%

+0.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.11%

17.31%

-1.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.33%

17.31%

+1.02%

REGL vs. DXUV - Expense Ratio Comparison

REGL has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than DXUV's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

REGL vs. DXUV - Dividend Comparison

REGL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.24%, more than DXUV's 0.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DXUV
Dimensional US Vector Equity ETF
0.96%1.01%0.37%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
REGL
ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
2.24%2.32%2.28%2.40%2.32%2.50%2.41%1.96%2.09%1.63%1.20%1.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


REGL and DXUV have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

REGL has higher volatility (3.65%) compared to DXUV (2.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REGL dropped -36.37% vs DXUV's -21.08%.

On 1-year performance, DXUV leads with 27.35% vs 9.25% for REGL. On fees, DXUV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, DXUV has been the lower-risk option at 2.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DXUV has performed better with a 27.35% return vs 9.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DXUV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for REGL.

REGL has the higher dividend yield at 2.24%, compared with 0.96% for DXUV.

They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Dimensional. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for REGL and 0.25% for DXUV.

DXUV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for REGL and DXUV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer