PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
REG vs. SPOT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

REG vs. SPOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Regency Centers Corporation (REG) and Spotify Technology S.A. (SPOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, REG achieves a 18.54% return, which is significantly higher than SPOT's -17.00% return.


REG

1D
0.43%
1M
6.55%
YTD
18.54%
6M
22.12%
1Y
18.96%
3Y*
14.45%
5Y*
7.74%
10Y*
4.12%

SPOT

1D
-0.82%
1M
11.43%
YTD
-17.00%
6M
-19.37%
1Y
-32.19%
3Y*
47.06%
5Y*
14.62%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

REG vs. SPOT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
REG
Regency Centers Corporation
18.54%-2.78%14.90%11.85%-13.59%71.41%-23.86%11.43%4.49%
SPOT
Spotify Technology S.A.
-17.00%29.80%138.08%138.01%-66.27%-25.62%110.40%31.76%-31.59%

Correlation

The correlation between REG and SPOT is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2018

0.14

The correlation between REG and SPOT shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.18 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

REG:

$14.72B

SPOT:

$100.87B

EPS

REG:

$3.55

SPOT:

€12.94

PE Ratio

REG:

22.61

SPOT:

32.21

PEG Ratio

REG:

2.21

SPOT:

0.36

PS Ratio

REG:

8.62

SPOT:

4.98

PB Ratio

REG:

2.21

SPOT:

10.87

Total Revenue (TTM)

REG:

$1.70B

SPOT:

€17.60B

Gross Profit (TTM)

REG:

$814.76M

SPOT:

€5.68B

EBITDA (TTM)

REG:

$1.12B

SPOT:

€2.75B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

REG vs. SPOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

REG
REG Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
REG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
REG Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
REG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
REG Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

SPOT
SPOT Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
SPOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPOT Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
SPOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPOT Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

REG vs. SPOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Regency Centers Corporation (REG) and Spotify Technology S.A. (SPOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


REGSPOTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

0.89

+0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.16

-0.67

+2.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.27

-1.16

+6.43

REG vs. SPOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current REG Sharpe Ratio is 1.11, which is higher than the SPOT Sharpe Ratio of -0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of REG and SPOT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

REG vs. SPOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REG drawdown since its inception was -73.37%, smaller than the maximum SPOT drawdown of -80.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REG and SPOT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


REGSPOTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.37%

-80.51%

+7.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.17%

-46.80%

+38.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.10%

-46.80%

+31.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.09%

-76.39%

+46.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.10%

-37.88%

+37.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.17%

-30.87%

+14.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.35%

27.16%

-23.81%

Volatility

REG vs. SPOT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Regency Centers Corporation (REG) is 4.45%, while Spotify Technology S.A. (SPOT) has a volatility of 16.23%. This indicates that REG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


REGSPOTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.45%

16.23%

-11.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.10%

37.28%

-26.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.90%

45.28%

-29.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.39%

47.58%

-25.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.88%

47.36%

-17.48%

Dividends

REG vs. SPOT - Dividend Comparison

REG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.70%, while SPOT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
REG
Regency Centers Corporation
3.70%4.16%3.67%3.91%4.04%3.20%5.22%3.71%3.78%3.04%2.90%2.85%
SPOT
Spotify Technology S.A.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

REG vs. SPOT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Regency Centers Corporation and Spotify Technology S.A.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B20222023202420252026
413.42M
4.61B
(REG) Total Revenue
(SPOT) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. REG values in USD, SPOT values in EUR

REG vs. SPOT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Regency Centers Corporation and Spotify Technology S.A. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
18.5%
32.9%
Portfolio components
REG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Regency Centers Corporation reported a gross profit of 76.40M and revenue of 413.42M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 18.5%.

SPOT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Spotify Technology S.A. reported a gross profit of 1.51B and revenue of 4.61B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.9%.

REG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Regency Centers Corporation reported an operating income of 152.73M and revenue of 413.42M, resulting in an operating margin of 36.9%.

SPOT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Spotify Technology S.A. reported an operating income of 726.76M and revenue of 4.61B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.8%.

REG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Regency Centers Corporation reported a net income of 128.55M and revenue of 413.42M, resulting in a net margin of 31.1%.

SPOT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Spotify Technology S.A. reported a net income of 732.86M and revenue of 4.61B, resulting in a net margin of 15.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


REG and SPOT have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPOT has higher volatility (16.23%) compared to REG (4.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REG dropped -73.37% vs SPOT's -80.51%.

REG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.11 vs -0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for REG and SPOT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer