PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
REG vs. IVV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

REG vs. IVV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Regency Centers Corporation (REG) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, REG achieves a 18.56% return, which is significantly higher than IVV's 10.13% return. Over the past 10 years, REG has underperformed IVV with an annualized return of 3.50%, while IVV has yielded a comparatively higher 15.11% annualized return.


REG

1D
-0.09%
1M
-0.83%
6M
12.31%
YTD
18.56%
1Y
18.58%
3Y*
11.28%
5Y*
8.45%
10Y*
3.50%
ALL TIME*
10.05%

IVV

1D
0.69%
1M
0.25%
6M
8.53%
YTD
10.13%
1Y
21.55%
3Y*
19.40%
5Y*
12.82%
10Y*
15.11%
ALL TIME*
8.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$3.36B$3.31B$5.91B
$115.94M$105.24M$116.44M

REG vs. IVV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
REG
Regency Centers Corporation
18.56%-2.78%14.90%11.85%-13.59%71.41%-23.86%11.43%-12.00%3.62%
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
10.13%17.85%24.93%26.31%-18.16%28.76%18.40%31.07%-4.49%21.75%

Correlation

The correlation between REG and IVV is 0.05, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.43

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2000

0.49

Over the past year, the correlation between REG and IVV has dropped to 0.05 - well below their long-term average of 0.49, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

REG vs. IVV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

REG
REG Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
REG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
REG Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
REG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
REG Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

IVV
IVV Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
IVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVV Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
IVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVV Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

REG vs. IVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Regency Centers Corporation (REG) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


REGIVVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.27

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.10

2.21

-0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.18

9.43

-4.25

REG vs. IVV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current REG Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is lower than the IVV Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of REG and IVV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

REG vs. IVV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REG drawdown since its inception was -73.37%, which is greater than IVV's maximum drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REG and IVV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


REGIVVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.37%

-55.25%

-18.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.17%

-8.89%

+0.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.10%

-18.75%

+3.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.09%

-24.53%

-5.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.76%

-33.90%

-21.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.89%

-1.41%

-1.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.11%

-10.72%

-5.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.30%

2.09%

+1.21%

Volatility

REG vs. IVV - Volatility Comparison

Regency Centers Corporation (REG) has a higher volatility of 5.17% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) at 3.52%. This indicates that REG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


REGIVVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.17%

3.52%

+1.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.67%

10.18%

+1.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.14%

12.89%

+3.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.18%

17.01%

+5.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.89%

18.06%

+11.83%

Dividends

REG vs. IVV - Dividend Comparison

REG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.70%, more than IVV's 1.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
1.09%1.17%1.30%1.44%1.66%1.20%1.57%1.85%2.21%1.75%2.01%2.27%
REG
Regency Centers Corporation
3.70%4.16%3.67%3.91%4.04%3.20%5.22%3.71%3.78%3.04%2.90%2.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


REG and IVV have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

REG has higher volatility (5.17%) compared to IVV (3.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REG dropped -73.37% vs IVV's -55.25%.

IVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for REG and IVV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer