RECS vs. SGRT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

RECS (Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF) and SGRT (SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. RECS is passively managed, while SGRT is actively managed. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RECS charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for SGRT.

Performance

RECS vs. SGRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF (RECS) and SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF (SGRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RECS achieves a 6.61% return, which is significantly lower than SGRT's 51.46% return.

RECS

• 1D: -0.75%
• 1M: 4.11%
• YTD: 6.61%
• 6M: 6.84%
• 1Y: 25.02%
• 3Y*: 21.66%
• 5Y*: 14.04%
• 10Y*: 9.89%

SGRT

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: 14.68%
• YTD: 51.46%
• 6M: 56.17%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RECS vs. SGRT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RECS Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF	6.61%	7.08%
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF	51.46%	25.25%

Correlation

The correlation between RECS and SGRT is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2025	0.61

Return for Risk

RECS vs. SGRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RECS

RECS Risk / Return Rank: 62
RECS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
RECS Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
RECS Omega Ratio Rank: 62
RECS Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
RECS Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RECS vs. SGRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF (RECS) and SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF (SGRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RECS	SGRT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.13	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.97	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.85	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.27	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RECS	SGRT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.13	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.86	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.61	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.38	3.81	-3.43

Drawdowns

RECS vs. SGRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RECS drawdown since its inception was -34.29%, which is greater than SGRT's maximum drawdown of -17.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RECS and SGRT.

Drawdown Indicators

	RECS	SGRT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.29%	-17.87%	-16.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.82%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.60%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.08%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.29%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.93%	0.00%	-0.93%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.28%	-3.11%	+1.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.04%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RECS	SGRT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.97%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.84%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.78%	33.41%	-21.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.38%	33.41%	-17.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.22%	33.41%	-17.19%

RECS vs. SGRT - Expense Ratio Comparison

RECS has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than SGRT's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

RECS vs. SGRT - Dividend Comparison

RECS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, more than SGRT's 0.11% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
RECS Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF	1.04%	1.11%	1.09%	1.00%	1.41%	20.64%	1.09%	0.49%
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF	0.11%	0.16%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RECS and SGRT in my portfolio?

RECS and SGRT have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RECS or SGRT?

On fees, RECS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RECS or SGRT?

RECS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for SGRT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RECS or SGRT?

RECS has the higher dividend yield at 1.04%, compared with 0.11% for SGRT.

What is the main difference between RECS and SGRT?

Their fees differ too: 0.15% for RECS and 0.59% for SGRT.