RECS vs. ^GSPC

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF (RECS) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC).

RECS is a passively managed fund by Ameriprise Financial that tracks the performance of the Beta Advantage Research Enhanced U.S. Equity Index. It was launched on Sep 25, 2019.

Performance

RECS vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF (RECS) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

RECS vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RECS Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF	-3.89%	19.30%	26.27%	23.19%	-14.39%	32.73%	15.35%	-0.93%	0.00%	0.00%
^GSPC S&P 500 Index	-3.95%	16.39%	23.31%	24.23%	-19.44%	26.89%	16.26%	28.88%	-6.24%	19.42%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with RECS having a -3.89% return and ^GSPC slightly lower at -3.95%. Over the past 10 years, RECS has underperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of 8.76%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively higher 12.24% annualized return.

RECS

• 1D: 0.69%
• 1M: -4.22%
• YTD: -3.89%
• 6M: -1.83%
• 1Y: 19.12%
• 3Y*: 19.05%
• 5Y*: 13.07%
• 10Y*: 8.76%

^GSPC

• 1D: 0.72%
• 1M: -4.45%
• YTD: -3.95%
• 6M: -2.02%
• 1Y: 16.73%
• 3Y*: 16.96%
• 5Y*: 10.34%
• 10Y*: 12.24%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

RECS vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RECS

RECS Risk / Return Rank: 61
RECS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
RECS Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
RECS Omega Ratio Rank: 62
RECS Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
RECS Martin Ratio Rank: 67

^GSPC

^GSPC Risk / Return Rank: 67
^GSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
^GSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
^GSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 69
^GSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
^GSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RECS vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF (RECS) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RECS	^GSPC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.06	0.92	+0.14
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.59	1.41	+0.18
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.21	+0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.57	1.41	+0.15
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.17	6.61	+0.56
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RECS vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RECS Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is comparable to the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RECS and ^GSPC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RECS	^GSPC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.06	0.92	+0.14
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.80	0.61	+0.19
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.54	0.68	-0.14
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.34	0.46	-0.12

Correlation

The correlation between RECS and ^GSPC is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Drawdowns

RECS vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RECS drawdown since its inception was -34.29%, smaller than the maximum ^GSPC drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RECS and ^GSPC.

Drawdown Indicators

	RECS	^GSPC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.29%	-56.78%	+22.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.45%	-12.14%	-0.31%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.08%	-25.43%	+3.35%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.29%	-33.92%	-0.37%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.69%	-5.78%	+0.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.29%	-10.75%	+9.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.72%	2.60%	+0.12%

Volatility

RECS vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF (RECS) is 5.08%, while S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) has a volatility of 5.37%. This indicates that RECS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RECS	^GSPC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.08%	5.37%	-0.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.29%	9.55%	-0.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.20%	18.33%	-0.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.40%	16.90%	-0.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.14%	18.05%	-1.91%