PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRF vs. VTI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRF vs. VTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF (PRF) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRF achieves a 14.83% return, which is significantly higher than VTI's 8.82% return. Over the past 10 years, PRF has underperformed VTI with an annualized return of 13.99%, while VTI has yielded a comparatively higher 15.14% annualized return.


PRF

1D
-0.54%
1M
0.85%
YTD
14.83%
6M
14.24%
1Y
31.19%
3Y*
20.98%
5Y*
12.86%
10Y*
13.99%

VTI

1D
-1.39%
1M
-0.84%
YTD
8.82%
6M
7.71%
1Y
24.22%
3Y*
20.62%
5Y*
11.90%
10Y*
15.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRF vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PRF
Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF
14.83%18.33%16.73%15.72%-7.79%31.12%7.78%27.42%-8.71%16.01%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
8.82%17.10%23.81%26.05%-19.52%25.68%21.08%30.67%-5.23%21.21%

Correlation

The correlation between PRF and VTI is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2005

0.94

The correlation between PRF and VTI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

PRF vs. VTI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PRF
VTI

Technology

24.4%
37.0%

Financial Services

15.6%
11.3%

Healthcare

11.6%
9.0%

Communication Services

9.1%
9.8%

Industrials

9.0%
9.4%

Consumer Cyclical

8.7%
9.7%

Energy

7.2%
3.3%

Consumer Defensive

5.9%
4.3%

Basic Materials

3.3%
1.9%

Utilities

3.0%
2.1%

Real Estate

2.3%
2.3%

Technology

PRF
24.4%
VTI
37.0%

Financial Services

PRF
15.6%
VTI
11.3%

Healthcare

PRF
11.6%
VTI
9.0%

Communication Services

PRF
9.1%
VTI
9.8%

Industrials

PRF
9.0%
VTI
9.4%

Consumer Cyclical

PRF
8.7%
VTI
9.7%

Energy

PRF
7.2%
VTI
3.3%

Consumer Defensive

PRF
5.9%
VTI
4.3%

Basic Materials

PRF
3.3%
VTI
1.9%

Utilities

PRF
3.0%
VTI
2.1%

Real Estate

PRF
2.3%
VTI
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRF vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRF
PRF Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
PRF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRF Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRF Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
PRF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRF Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

VTI
VTI Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
VTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTI Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
VTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTI Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRF vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF (PRF) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PRFVTIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.34

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.75

2.73

+2.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.37

12.14

+7.23

PRF vs. VTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRF Sharpe Ratio is 2.86, which is higher than the VTI Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRF and VTI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PRF vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRF drawdown since its inception was -60.35%, which is greater than VTI's maximum drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRF and VTI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRFVTIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.35%

-55.45%

-4.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.59%

-8.92%

+2.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.82%

-19.30%

+3.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.72%

-25.36%

+5.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.16%

-35.00%

-3.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.39%

-2.85%

+1.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.91%

-8.01%

+1.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.61%

2.00%

-0.39%

Volatility

PRF vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF (PRF) is 3.70%, while Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) has a volatility of 4.95%. This indicates that PRF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRFVTIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.70%

4.95%

-1.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.24%

10.05%

-1.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.99%

12.83%

-1.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.20%

17.51%

-2.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.65%

18.32%

-0.67%

PRF vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRF has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

PRF vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison

PRF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%, more than VTI's 1.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PRF
Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF
1.39%1.59%1.78%1.84%2.01%1.58%1.97%1.99%2.25%1.58%2.17%2.25%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
1.04%1.12%1.27%1.44%1.66%1.21%1.42%1.78%2.04%1.71%1.92%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


PRF and VTI have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VTI has higher volatility (4.95%) compared to PRF (3.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRF dropped -60.35% vs VTI's -55.45%.

On 10-year performance, VTI leads with 15.14% vs 13.99% for PRF. On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, PRF has been the lower-risk option at 3.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VTI has performed better with a 15.14% return vs 13.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for PRF.

PRF has the higher dividend yield at 1.39%, compared with 1.04% for VTI.

PRF is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while VTI is Large Cap Blend Equities. PRF tracks RAFI Fundamental Select US 1000 Index, while VTI tracks CRSP US Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for PRF and 0.03% for VTI.

PRF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.86 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRF and VTI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer