RDWU vs. LINT
RDWU (T-REX 2X Long RDW Daily Target ETF) and LINT (Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds. RDWU is passively managed, while LINT is actively managed. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RDWU charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for LINT.
Performance
RDWU vs. LINT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
RDWU
- 1D
- 31.87%
- 1M
- 376.22%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LINT
- 1D
- -2.08%
- 1M
- 0.88%
- YTD
- 549.02%
- 6M
- 433.40%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RDWU vs. LINT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
RDWU T-REX 2X Long RDW Daily Target ETF | 71.70% |
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares | 358.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between RDWU and LINT is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2026 | 0.32 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RDWU vs. LINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long RDW Daily Target ETF (RDWU) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RDWU | LINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.53 | 22.52 | -20.99 |
Drawdowns
RDWU vs. LINT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RDWU drawdown since its inception was -66.94%, which is greater than LINT's maximum drawdown of -49.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDWU and LINT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RDWU | LINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.94% | -49.54% | -17.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -35.27% | -28.08% | -7.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.07% | -20.57% | -22.50% |
Volatility
RDWU vs. LINT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RDWU | LINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 255.53% | 162.52% | +93.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 255.53% | 162.52% | +93.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 255.53% | 162.52% | +93.01% |
RDWU vs. LINT - Expense Ratio Comparison
RDWU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than LINT's 0.97% expense ratio.
Dividends
RDWU vs. LINT - Dividend Comparison
RDWU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares | 0.13% | 0.25% |
RDWU T-REX 2X Long RDW Daily Target ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RDWU and LINT have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LINT is cheaper at 0.97% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LINT is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for RDWU.
LINT has the higher dividend yield at 0.13%, compared with 0.00% for RDWU.
They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for RDWU and 0.97% for LINT.
Find the right allocation for RDWU and LINT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer