PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RDWU vs. LINT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RDWU vs. LINT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-REX 2X Long RDW Daily Target ETF (RDWU) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


RDWU

1D
31.87%
1M
376.22%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

LINT

1D
-2.08%
1M
0.88%
YTD
549.02%
6M
433.40%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RDWU vs. LINT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between RDWU and LINT is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2026

0.32

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RDWU vs. LINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long RDW Daily Target ETF (RDWU) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

RDWU vs. LINT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RDWULINTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.53

22.52

-20.99

Drawdowns

RDWU vs. LINT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RDWU drawdown since its inception was -66.94%, which is greater than LINT's maximum drawdown of -49.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDWU and LINT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RDWULINTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.94%

-49.54%

-17.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-35.27%

-28.08%

-7.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.07%

-20.57%

-22.50%

Volatility

RDWU vs. LINT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RDWULINTDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

255.53%

162.52%

+93.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

255.53%

162.52%

+93.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

255.53%

162.52%

+93.01%

RDWU vs. LINT - Expense Ratio Comparison

RDWU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than LINT's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

RDWU vs. LINT - Dividend Comparison

RDWU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%.


Frequently Asked Questions


RDWU and LINT have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LINT is cheaper at 0.97% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LINT is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for RDWU.

LINT has the higher dividend yield at 0.13%, compared with 0.00% for RDWU.

They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for RDWU and 0.97% for LINT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RDWU and LINT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer