RDVT vs. QDTE
RDVT (Red Violet, Inc.) is a stock, while QDTE (Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF) is Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill. Over the past year, RDVT returned 14.56% vs 39.53% for QDTE. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RDVT vs. QDTE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RDVT achieves a -4.55% return, which is significantly lower than QDTE's 16.38% return.
RDVT
- 1D
- -1.34%
- 1M
- 7.35%
- YTD
- -4.55%
- 6M
- -3.02%
- 1Y
- 14.56%
- 3Y*
- 40.46%
- 5Y*
- 22.00%
- 10Y*
- —
QDTE
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 3.16%
- YTD
- 16.38%
- 6M
- 15.88%
- 1Y
- 39.53%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RDVT vs. QDTE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
RDVT Red Violet, Inc. | -4.55% | 58.63% | 98.36% |
QDTE Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF | 16.38% | 19.32% | 17.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between RDVT and QDTE is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2024 | 0.39 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RDVT vs. QDTE — Risk / Return Rank
RDVT
QDTE
RDVT vs. QDTE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Red Violet, Inc. (RDVT) and Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RDVT | QDTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.43 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.35 | 3.89 | -3.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.77 | 15.12 | -14.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RDVT vs. QDTE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RDVT drawdown since its inception was -90.17%, which is greater than QDTE's maximum drawdown of -22.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDVT and QDTE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RDVT | QDTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.17% | -22.86% | -67.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.11% | -10.20% | -31.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.11% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.73% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.52% | -0.33% | -8.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -50.26% | -3.13% | -47.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.98% | 2.62% | +16.36% |
Volatility
RDVT vs. QDTE - Volatility Comparison
Red Violet, Inc. (RDVT) has a higher volatility of 13.13% compared to Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE) at 7.84%. This indicates that RDVT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QDTE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RDVT | QDTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.13% | 7.84% | +5.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.50% | 12.94% | +24.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.68% | 16.37% | +29.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.34% | 18.88% | +30.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 71.29% | 18.88% | +52.41% |
Dividends
RDVT vs. QDTE - Dividend Comparison
RDVT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QDTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 42.80%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
QDTE Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF | 42.80% | 49.49% | 32.09% |
RDVT Red Violet, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.53% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RDVT and QDTE have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RDVT has higher volatility (13.13%) compared to QDTE (7.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RDVT dropped -90.17% vs QDTE's -22.86%.
QDTE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RDVT and QDTE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer