PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RDVT vs. NUKZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RDVT vs. NUKZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Red Violet, Inc. (RDVT) and Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RDVT achieves a 16.75% return, which is significantly higher than NUKZ's -1.84% return.


RDVT

1D
1.96%
1M
20.67%
6M
32.45%
YTD
16.75%
1Y
46.36%
3Y*
47.32%
5Y*
23.87%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
10.60%

NUKZ

1D
-0.16%
1M
-12.76%
6M
-11.94%
YTD
-1.84%
1Y
5.48%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
43.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RDVT vs. NUKZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
RDVT
Red Violet, Inc.
16.75%58.63%93.07%
NUKZ
Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF
-1.84%56.57%60.11%

Correlation

The correlation between RDVT and NUKZ is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2024

0.29

The correlation between RDVT and NUKZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (1 year) to 0.29 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RDVT vs. NUKZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RDVT
RDVT Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
RDVT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RDVT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
RDVT Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
RDVT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
RDVT Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

NUKZ
NUKZ Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
NUKZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUKZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUKZ Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
NUKZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUKZ Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RDVT vs. NUKZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Red Violet, Inc. (RDVT) and Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RDVTNUKZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.05

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.11

0.30

+0.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.52

0.70

+1.82

RDVT vs. NUKZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RDVT Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is higher than the NUKZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RDVT and NUKZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RDVT vs. NUKZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RDVT drawdown since its inception was -90.17%, which is greater than NUKZ's maximum drawdown of -33.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDVT and NUKZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RDVTNUKZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.17%

-33.03%

-57.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-42.11%

-18.23%

-23.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.23%

-18.23%

+15.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-49.83%

-6.30%

-43.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.46%

7.83%

+10.63%

Volatility

RDVT vs. NUKZ - Volatility Comparison

Red Violet, Inc. (RDVT) has a higher volatility of 11.06% compared to Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ) at 6.47%. This indicates that RDVT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NUKZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RDVTNUKZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.06%

6.47%

+4.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.89%

23.01%

+13.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.88%

30.55%

+15.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

49.32%

32.65%

+16.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

71.08%

32.65%

+38.43%

Dividends

RDVT vs. NUKZ - Dividend Comparison

RDVT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NUKZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%.


PositionTTM20252024
NUKZ
Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF
0.93%0.91%0.09%
RDVT
Red Violet, Inc.
0.00%0.53%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RDVT and NUKZ have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RDVT has higher volatility (11.06%) compared to NUKZ (6.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RDVT dropped -90.17% vs NUKZ's -33.03%.

RDVT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.02 vs 0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RDVT and NUKZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer