RDTE vs. LFGY

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

RDTE (Roundhill Small Cap 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF) and LFGY (YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, RDTE returned 24.27% vs 4.87% for LFGY. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RDTE charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for LFGY.

Performance

RDTE vs. LFGY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Small Cap 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (RDTE) and YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (LFGY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RDTE achieves a 10.92% return, which is significantly lower than LFGY's 14.39% return.

RDTE

• 1D: 0.90%
• 1M: -1.67%
• YTD: 10.92%
• 6M: 9.96%
• 1Y: 24.27%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LFGY

• 1D: 4.44%
• 1M: -3.09%
• YTD: 14.39%
• 6M: 4.19%
• 1Y: 4.87%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RDTE vs. LFGY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RDTE Roundhill Small Cap 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF	10.92%	11.09%
LFGY YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF	14.39%	-9.35%

Correlation

The correlation between RDTE and LFGY is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.66
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2025	0.68

The correlation between RDTE and LFGY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

RDTE vs. LFGY - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RDTE	LFGY
Financial Services	6.4%	55.9%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	6.5%
Consumer Cyclical	-	4.1%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	33.5%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

RDTE vs. LFGY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RDTE

RDTE Risk / Return Rank: 49
RDTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
RDTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
RDTE Omega Ratio Rank: 42
RDTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
RDTE Martin Ratio Rank: 57

LFGY

LFGY Risk / Return Rank: 12
LFGY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
LFGY Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
LFGY Omega Ratio Rank: 13
LFGY Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
LFGY Martin Ratio Rank: 11

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RDTE vs. LFGY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Small Cap 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (RDTE) and YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (LFGY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RDTE	LFGY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.43	0.13	+1.30
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.98	0.44	+1.55
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.05	+0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.66	0.14	+2.52
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.20	0.30	+8.90
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RDTE vs. LFGY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RDTE Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is higher than the LFGY Sharpe Ratio of 0.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RDTE and LFGY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RDTE	LFGY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.43	0.13	+1.30
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.90	0.09	+0.82

Drawdowns

RDTE vs. LFGY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RDTE drawdown since its inception was -24.32%, smaller than the maximum LFGY drawdown of -35.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDTE and LFGY.

Drawdown Indicators

	RDTE	LFGY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.32%	-35.94%	+11.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.17%	-35.94%	+26.77%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.65%	-12.62%	+9.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.65%	-14.06%	+9.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.65%	16.48%	-13.83%

Volatility

RDTE vs. LFGY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Roundhill Small Cap 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (RDTE) is 5.84%, while YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (LFGY) has a volatility of 12.43%. This indicates that RDTE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LFGY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RDTE	LFGY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.84%	12.43%	-6.59%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.85%	31.17%	-18.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.09%	37.80%	-20.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.32%	42.36%	-23.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.32%	42.36%	-23.04%

RDTE vs. LFGY - Expense Ratio Comparison

RDTE has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than LFGY's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

RDTE vs. LFGY - Dividend Comparison

RDTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 46.18%, less than LFGY's 82.87% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
LFGY YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF	82.87%	94.90%	0.00%
RDTE Roundhill Small Cap 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF	46.18%	50.16%	10.70%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RDTE and LFGY in my portfolio?

RDTE and LFGY have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RDTE or LFGY?

LFGY has higher volatility (12.43%) compared to RDTE (5.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RDTE dropped -24.32% vs LFGY's -35.94%.

Which ETF is better, RDTE or LFGY?

On 1-year performance, RDTE leads with 24.27% vs 4.87% for LFGY. On fees, RDTE is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, RDTE has been the lower-risk option at 5.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RDTE or LFGY?

Over the 1-year period, RDTE has performed better with a 24.27% return vs 4.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RDTE or LFGY?

RDTE is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for LFGY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RDTE or LFGY?

LFGY has the higher dividend yield at 82.87%, compared with 46.18% for RDTE.

What is the main difference between RDTE and LFGY?

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for RDTE and 0.99% for LFGY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RDTE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.