LFGY vs. CHPY

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

LFGY (YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF) and CHPY (YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from YieldMax. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, LFGY returned -0.86% vs 93.51% for CHPY. Their 0.59 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. LFGY charges 1.02%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for CHPY.

Performance

LFGY vs. CHPY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (LFGY) and YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LFGY achieves a 6.34% return, which is significantly lower than CHPY's 55.50% return.

LFGY

• 1D: -1.42%
• 1M: -1.38%
• 6M: 5.38%
• YTD: 6.34%
• 1Y: -0.86%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -2.36%

CHPY

• 1D: 0.27%
• 1M: -11.10%
• 6M: 39.35%
• YTD: 55.50%
• 1Y: 93.51%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 95.90%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CHPY YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF	$53.10M	$56.24M	$62.00M
LFGY YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF	$957.02K	$905.59K	$1.33M

LFGY vs. CHPY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
LFGY YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF	6.34%	13.30%
CHPY YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF	55.50%	56.76%

Correlation

The correlation between LFGY and CHPY is 0.59, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.59
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2025	0.59

The correlation between LFGY and CHPY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

LFGY vs. CHPY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LFGY

LFGY Risk / Return Rank: 9
LFGY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
LFGY Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
LFGY Omega Ratio Rank: 10
LFGY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
LFGY Martin Ratio Rank: 8

CHPY

CHPY Risk / Return Rank: 89
CHPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
CHPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
CHPY Omega Ratio Rank: 88
CHPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
CHPY Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LFGY vs. CHPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (LFGY) and YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LFGY	CHPY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.15	2.41	-2.56
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.07	2.82	-2.75
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.01	1.39	-0.38
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.17	3.33	-3.50
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.36	15.63	-15.99

LFGY vs. CHPY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LFGY Sharpe Ratio is -0.15, which is lower than the CHPY Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LFGY and CHPY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LFGY vs. CHPY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LFGY drawdown since its inception was -35.94%, which is greater than CHPY's maximum drawdown of -27.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LFGY and CHPY.

Drawdown Indicators

	LFGY	CHPY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.94%	-27.64%	-8.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-35.94%	-27.64%	-8.30%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-18.77%	-20.81%	+2.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.12%	-3.03%	-11.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	17.27%	5.88%	+11.39%

Volatility

LFGY vs. CHPY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (LFGY) is 14.26%, while YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY) has a volatility of 17.69%. This indicates that LFGY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LFGY	CHPY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.26%	17.69%	-3.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	33.33%	34.00%	-0.67%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	40.62%	38.28%	+2.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	42.60%	39.15%	+3.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	42.60%	39.15%	+3.45%

LFGY vs. CHPY - Expense Ratio Comparison

LFGY has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than CHPY's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

LFGY vs. CHPY - Dividend Comparison

LFGY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 85.75%, more than CHPY's 38.69% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
CHPY YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF	38.69%	28.19%
LFGY YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF	85.75%	94.90%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LFGY and CHPY in my portfolio?

LFGY and CHPY have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LFGY or CHPY?

CHPY has higher volatility (17.69%) compared to LFGY (14.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LFGY dropped -35.94% vs CHPY's -27.64%.

Which ETF is better, LFGY or CHPY?

On 1-year performance, CHPY leads with 93.51% vs -0.86% for LFGY. On fees, CHPY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, LFGY has been the lower-risk option at 14.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LFGY or CHPY?

Over the 1-year period, CHPY has performed better with a 93.51% return vs -0.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LFGY or CHPY?

CHPY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.02% for LFGY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LFGY or CHPY?

LFGY has the higher dividend yield at 85.75%, compared with 38.69% for CHPY.

What is the main difference between LFGY and CHPY?

Their fees differ too: 1.02% for LFGY and 0.99% for CHPY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CHPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs -0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.