PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LFGY vs. MSTY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LFGY vs. MSTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (LFGY) and YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (MSTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LFGY achieves a 18.74% return, which is significantly higher than MSTY's -24.36% return.


LFGY

1D
-0.65%
1M
1.27%
YTD
18.74%
6M
12.89%
1Y
9.36%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MSTY

1D
-1.97%
1M
-28.49%
YTD
-24.36%
6M
-28.98%
1Y
-65.11%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LFGY vs. MSTY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between LFGY and MSTY is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2025

0.74

The correlation between LFGY and MSTY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LFGY vs. MSTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LFGY
LFGY Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
LFGY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LFGY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
LFGY Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
LFGY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
LFGY Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

MSTY
MSTY Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
MSTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSTY Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
MSTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSTY Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LFGY vs. MSTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (LFGY) and YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (MSTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LFGYMSTYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

0.79

+0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.26

-0.91

+1.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.56

-1.33

+1.89

LFGY vs. MSTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LFGY Sharpe Ratio is 0.24, which is higher than the MSTY Sharpe Ratio of -1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LFGY and MSTY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LFGY vs. MSTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LFGY drawdown since its inception was -35.94%, smaller than the maximum MSTY drawdown of -71.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LFGY and MSTY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LFGYMSTYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.94%

-71.79%

+35.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.94%

-71.79%

+35.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.30%

-70.26%

+60.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.96%

-26.90%

+12.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.62%

49.15%

-32.53%

Volatility

LFGY vs. MSTY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (LFGY) is 13.33%, while YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (MSTY) has a volatility of 19.16%. This indicates that LFGY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LFGYMSTYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.33%

19.16%

-5.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.32%

49.48%

-18.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.56%

62.00%

-23.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.38%

71.81%

-29.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.38%

71.81%

-29.43%

LFGY vs. MSTY - Expense Ratio Comparison

LFGY has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than MSTY's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

LFGY vs. MSTY - Dividend Comparison

LFGY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 79.45%, less than MSTY's 273.05% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


LFGY and MSTY have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSTY has higher volatility (19.16%) compared to LFGY (13.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LFGY dropped -35.94% vs MSTY's -71.79%.

On 1-year performance, LFGY leads with 9.36% vs -65.11% for MSTY. On fees, MSTY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, LFGY has been the lower-risk option at 13.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, LFGY has performed better with a 9.36% return vs -65.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MSTY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.02% for LFGY.

MSTY has the higher dividend yield at 273.05%, compared with 79.45% for LFGY.

Their fees differ too: 1.02% for LFGY and 0.99% for MSTY.

LFGY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.24 vs -1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LFGY and MSTY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer