RDOG vs. RFDA
Compare and contrast key facts about ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF (RDOG) and RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA).
RDOG and RFDA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RDOG is a passively managed fund by SS&C that tracks the performance of the S-Network REIT Dividend Dogs Index. It was launched on May 7, 2008. RFDA is an actively managed fund by SS&C. It was launched on Jun 7, 2016.
Performance
RDOG vs. RFDA - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RDOG vs. RFDA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RDOG ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF | 0.69% | 0.95% | 4.57% | 10.38% | -25.53% | 34.42% | -10.01% | 21.54% | -5.70% | 11.84% |
RFDA RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF | -1.05% | 16.42% | 20.12% | 16.98% | -8.58% | 25.94% | 11.26% | 27.15% | -9.27% | 19.86% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RDOG achieves a 0.69% return, which is significantly higher than RFDA's -1.05% return.
RDOG
- 1D
- 1.11%
- 1M
- -7.08%
- YTD
- 0.69%
- 6M
- 0.88%
- 1Y
- 1.77%
- 3Y*
- 6.38%
- 5Y*
- 1.17%
- 10Y*
- 2.91%
RFDA
- 1D
- 1.86%
- 1M
- -1.50%
- YTD
- -1.05%
- 6M
- 0.65%
- 1Y
- 20.44%
- 3Y*
- 16.13%
- 5Y*
- 11.66%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RDOG vs. RFDA - Expense Ratio Comparison
RDOG has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than RFDA's 0.52% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RDOG vs. RFDA — Risk / Return Rank
RDOG
RFDA
RDOG vs. RFDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF (RDOG) and RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RDOG | RFDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.10 | 1.16 | -1.06 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.26 | 1.70 | -1.44 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.27 | -0.23 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.17 | 1.66 | -1.49 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.55 | 8.46 | -7.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RDOG | RFDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 | 1.16 | -1.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 | 0.75 | -0.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.13 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.14 | 0.72 | -0.58 |
Correlation
The correlation between RDOG and RFDA is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
RDOG vs. RFDA - Dividend Comparison
RDOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.93%, more than RFDA's 1.99% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RDOG ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF | 6.93% | 6.91% | 6.11% | 7.07% | 5.25% | 3.11% | 5.12% | 3.10% | 3.13% | 3.64% | 3.66% | 3.43% |
RFDA RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF | 1.99% | 1.89% | 2.23% | 2.68% | 3.57% | 1.44% | 1.62% | 1.87% | 2.44% | 1.90% | 0.98% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
RDOG vs. RFDA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RDOG drawdown since its inception was -67.59%, which is greater than RFDA's maximum drawdown of -34.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDOG and RFDA.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RDOG | RFDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.59% | -34.60% | -32.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.61% | -12.73% | -0.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.52% | -19.35% | -16.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.35% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.29% | -3.62% | -9.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.33% | -3.80% | -8.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.13% | 2.49% | +1.64% |
Volatility
RDOG vs. RFDA - Volatility Comparison
ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF (RDOG) has a higher volatility of 5.46% compared to RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA) at 4.32%. This indicates that RDOG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RFDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RDOG | RFDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.46% | 4.32% | +1.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.21% | 8.90% | +1.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.72% | 17.70% | +0.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.86% | 15.73% | +4.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.02% | 16.93% | +6.09% |