PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RDOG vs. RFDA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RDOG vs. RFDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF (RDOG) and RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RDOG achieves a 13.77% return, which is significantly higher than RFDA's 11.40% return.


RDOG

1D
-0.80%
1M
3.92%
YTD
13.77%
6M
14.44%
1Y
20.06%
3Y*
11.40%
5Y*
2.28%
10Y*
4.05%

RFDA

1D
-0.92%
1M
4.27%
YTD
11.40%
6M
12.25%
1Y
29.49%
3Y*
19.19%
5Y*
13.17%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RDOG vs. RFDA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RDOG
ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF
13.77%0.95%4.57%10.38%-25.53%34.42%-10.01%21.54%-5.70%11.84%
RFDA
RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF
11.40%16.42%20.12%16.98%-8.58%25.94%11.26%27.15%-9.27%19.86%

Correlation

The correlation between RDOG and RFDA is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 8, 2016

0.60

The correlation between RDOG and RFDA shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (1 year) to 0.68 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

RDOG vs. RFDA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RDOG
RFDA

Real Estate

100.0%
5.0%

Basic Materials

-

1.8%

Communication Services

-

8.8%

Consumer Cyclical

-

7.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

7.6%

Energy

-

12.5%

Financial Services

-

14.7%

Healthcare

-

8.8%

Industrials

-

8.9%

Technology

-

19.9%

Utilities

-

5.0%

Real Estate

RDOG
100.0%
RFDA
5.0%

Basic Materials

RDOG

-

RFDA
1.8%

Communication Services

RDOG

-

RFDA
8.8%

Consumer Cyclical

RDOG

-

RFDA
7.0%

Consumer Defensive

RDOG

-

RFDA
7.6%

Energy

RDOG

-

RFDA
12.5%

Financial Services

RDOG

-

RFDA
14.7%

Healthcare

RDOG

-

RFDA
8.8%

Industrials

RDOG

-

RFDA
8.9%

Technology

RDOG

-

RFDA
19.9%

Utilities

RDOG

-

RFDA
5.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RDOG vs. RFDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RDOG
RDOG Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
RDOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RDOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
RDOG Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
RDOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
RDOG Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

RFDA
RFDA Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
RFDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RFDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
RFDA Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
RFDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
RFDA Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RDOG vs. RFDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF (RDOG) and RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RDOGRFDADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.47

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.01

5.44

-3.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.51

19.87

-13.36

RDOG vs. RFDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RDOG Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is lower than the RFDA Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RDOG and RFDA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RDOGRFDADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.39

2.55

-1.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

0.84

-0.73

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.17

0.79

-0.63

Drawdowns

RDOG vs. RFDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RDOG drawdown since its inception was -67.59%, which is greater than RFDA's maximum drawdown of -34.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDOG and RFDA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RDOGRFDADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.59%

-34.60%

-32.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.02%

-5.45%

-4.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.40%

-19.35%

-2.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.52%

-19.35%

-16.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.03%

-0.92%

-1.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.26%

-3.74%

-8.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.09%

1.49%

+1.60%

Volatility

RDOG vs. RFDA - Volatility Comparison

ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF (RDOG) has a higher volatility of 3.98% compared to RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA) at 2.66%. This indicates that RDOG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RFDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RDOGRFDADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.98%

2.66%

+1.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.42%

8.47%

+1.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.52%

11.64%

+2.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.84%

15.73%

+4.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.05%

16.85%

+6.20%

RDOG vs. RFDA - Expense Ratio Comparison

RDOG has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than RFDA's 0.52% expense ratio.


Dividends

RDOG vs. RFDA - Dividend Comparison

RDOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.13%, more than RFDA's 1.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RDOG
ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF
6.13%6.91%6.11%7.07%5.25%3.11%5.12%3.10%3.13%3.64%3.66%3.43%
RFDA
RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF
1.77%1.89%2.23%2.68%3.57%1.44%1.62%1.87%2.44%1.90%0.98%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RDOG and RFDA have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RDOG has higher volatility (3.98%) compared to RFDA (2.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RDOG dropped -67.59% vs RFDA's -34.60%.

On 5-year performance, RFDA leads with 13.17% vs 2.28% for RDOG. On fees, RDOG is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, RFDA has been the lower-risk option at 2.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, RFDA has performed better with a 13.17% return vs 2.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RDOG is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for RFDA.

RDOG has the higher dividend yield at 6.13%, compared with 1.77% for RFDA.

RDOG is categorized as REIT, while RFDA is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for RDOG and 0.52% for RFDA.

RFDA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RDOG and RFDA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer