RDOG vs. BIZD
Compare and contrast key facts about ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF (RDOG) and VanEck Vectors BDC Income ETF (BIZD).
RDOG and BIZD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RDOG is a passively managed fund by SS&C that tracks the performance of the S-Network REIT Dividend Dogs Index. It was launched on May 7, 2008. BIZD is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MVIS US Business Development Companies Index. It was launched on Feb 11, 2013. Both RDOG and BIZD are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: RDOG or BIZD.
Correlation
The correlation between RDOG and BIZD is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
RDOG vs. BIZD - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
RDOG:
0.31
BIZD:
1.32
RDOG:
0.55
BIZD:
1.81
RDOG:
1.07
BIZD:
1.24
RDOG:
0.22
BIZD:
1.65
RDOG:
1.04
BIZD:
6.10
RDOG:
5.51%
BIZD:
2.38%
RDOG:
18.27%
BIZD:
11.01%
RDOG:
-69.88%
BIZD:
-55.47%
RDOG:
-15.10%
BIZD:
-1.30%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RDOG achieves a 4.05% return, which is significantly lower than BIZD's 13.35% return. Over the past 10 years, RDOG has underperformed BIZD with an annualized return of 3.00%, while BIZD has yielded a comparatively higher 9.28% annualized return.
RDOG
4.05%
-4.19%
8.23%
5.11%
0.91%
3.00%
BIZD
13.35%
1.46%
3.94%
14.23%
10.59%
9.28%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RDOG vs. BIZD - Expense Ratio Comparison
RDOG has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than BIZD's 10.92% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
RDOG vs. BIZD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF (RDOG) and VanEck Vectors BDC Income ETF (BIZD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
RDOG vs. BIZD - Dividend Comparison
RDOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.14%, less than BIZD's 11.02% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RDOG ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF | 6.14% | 7.07% | 5.25% | 2.98% | 5.11% | 3.10% | 3.13% | 3.64% | 3.66% | 3.43% | 2.90% | 1.03% |
BIZD VanEck Vectors BDC Income ETF | 11.02% | 10.97% | 11.22% | 8.14% | 10.39% | 9.13% | 10.88% | 9.13% | 8.51% | 9.12% | 8.51% | 5.45% |
Drawdowns
RDOG vs. BIZD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RDOG drawdown since its inception was -69.88%, which is greater than BIZD's maximum drawdown of -55.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDOG and BIZD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
RDOG vs. BIZD - Volatility Comparison
ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF (RDOG) has a higher volatility of 5.83% compared to VanEck Vectors BDC Income ETF (BIZD) at 2.75%. This indicates that RDOG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIZD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.