PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RDOG vs. KBWD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RDOG vs. KBWD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF (RDOG) and Invesco KBW High Dividend Yield Financial ETF (KBWD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RDOG achieves a 17.52% return, which is significantly higher than KBWD's -5.53% return. Over the past 10 years, RDOG has underperformed KBWD with an annualized return of 4.49%, while KBWD has yielded a comparatively higher 5.03% annualized return.


RDOG

1D
1.34%
1M
2.64%
YTD
17.52%
6M
19.48%
1Y
20.13%
3Y*
13.65%
5Y*
2.58%
10Y*
4.49%

KBWD

1D
0.83%
1M
-1.47%
YTD
-5.53%
6M
-5.36%
1Y
1.75%
3Y*
5.35%
5Y*
0.47%
10Y*
5.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RDOG vs. KBWD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RDOG
ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF
17.52%0.95%4.57%10.38%-25.53%34.42%-10.01%21.54%-5.70%11.84%
KBWD
Invesco KBW High Dividend Yield Financial ETF
-5.53%5.59%4.30%20.21%-19.14%31.89%-15.58%20.72%-8.70%12.06%

Correlation

The correlation between RDOG and KBWD is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2010

0.65

The correlation between RDOG and KBWD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RDOG vs. KBWD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RDOG
RDOG Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
RDOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RDOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
RDOG Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
RDOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
RDOG Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

KBWD
KBWD Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
KBWD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KBWD Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
KBWD Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
KBWD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
KBWD Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RDOG vs. KBWD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF (RDOG) and Invesco KBW High Dividend Yield Financial ETF (KBWD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RDOGKBWDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.03

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.02

0.12

+1.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.52

0.28

+6.24

RDOG vs. KBWD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RDOG Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is higher than the KBWD Sharpe Ratio of 0.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RDOG and KBWD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RDOG vs. KBWD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RDOG drawdown since its inception was -67.59%, which is greater than KBWD's maximum drawdown of -58.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDOG and KBWD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RDOGKBWDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.59%

-58.63%

-8.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.02%

-15.05%

+5.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.40%

-19.65%

-1.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.52%

-30.74%

-4.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.35%

-58.63%

+9.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.08%

-12.25%

+11.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.23%

-7.42%

-4.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.10%

6.35%

-3.25%

Volatility

RDOG vs. KBWD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF (RDOG) is 4.55%, while Invesco KBW High Dividend Yield Financial ETF (KBWD) has a volatility of 4.99%. This indicates that RDOG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KBWD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RDOGKBWDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.55%

4.99%

-0.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.04%

12.57%

-1.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.91%

15.67%

-0.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.85%

19.84%

+0.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.05%

23.26%

-0.21%

RDOG vs. KBWD - Expense Ratio Comparison

RDOG has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than KBWD's 5.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

RDOG vs. KBWD - Dividend Comparison

RDOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.21%, less than KBWD's 14.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KBWD
Invesco KBW High Dividend Yield Financial ETF
14.50%12.83%12.45%11.45%11.32%7.26%9.68%8.63%9.47%8.77%8.68%8.89%
RDOG
ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF
6.21%6.91%6.11%7.07%5.25%3.11%5.12%3.10%3.13%3.64%3.66%3.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


RDOG and KBWD have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KBWD has higher volatility (4.99%) compared to RDOG (4.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RDOG dropped -67.59% vs KBWD's -58.63%.

On 10-year performance, KBWD leads with 5.03% vs 4.49% for RDOG. On fees, RDOG is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, RDOG has been the lower-risk option at 4.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, KBWD has performed better with a 5.03% return vs 4.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RDOG is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 5.39% for KBWD.

KBWD has the higher dividend yield at 14.50%, compared with 6.21% for RDOG.

RDOG is categorized as REIT, while KBWD is Financials Equities. RDOG tracks S-Network REIT Dividend Dogs Index, while KBWD tracks KBW Nasdaq Financial Sector Dividend Yield Index. They also come from different issuers: SS&C and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for RDOG and 5.39% for KBWD.

RDOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs 0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RDOG and KBWD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer