RDIV vs. XLE
RDIV (Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF) and XLE (State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RDIV is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P 900 Dividend Revenue-Weighted Index, while XLE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Energy Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RDIV returned 11.39%/yr vs 9.91%/yr for XLE. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RDIV charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLE.
Performance
RDIV vs. XLE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RDIV achieves a 16.75% return, which is significantly lower than XLE's 29.56% return. Over the past 10 years, RDIV has outperformed XLE with an annualized return of 11.39%, while XLE has yielded a comparatively lower 9.91% annualized return.
RDIV
- 1D
- 1.52%
- 1M
- 6.52%
- YTD
- 16.75%
- 6M
- 14.41%
- 1Y
- 32.09%
- 3Y*
- 19.66%
- 5Y*
- 11.12%
- 10Y*
- 11.39%
XLE
- 1D
- 0.75%
- 1M
- -0.90%
- YTD
- 29.56%
- 6M
- 28.37%
- 1Y
- 34.84%
- 3Y*
- 16.18%
- 5Y*
- 20.12%
- 10Y*
- 9.91%
RDIV vs. XLE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RDIV Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF | 16.75% | 12.36% | 15.17% | 4.66% | 7.16% | 29.12% | -9.31% | 22.62% | -4.78% | 11.63% |
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 29.56% | 7.88% | 5.56% | -0.63% | 64.32% | 53.28% | -32.67% | 11.74% | -18.22% | -0.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between RDIV and XLE is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2013 | 0.64 |
Over the past year, the correlation between RDIV and XLE has dropped to 0.42 - well below their long-term average of 0.64, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
RDIV vs. XLE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RDIV
XLE
Financial Services
-
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
-
Healthcare
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Industrials
-
-
Financial Services
RDIV
XLE
-
Energy
RDIV
XLE
Consumer Cyclical
RDIV
XLE
-
Consumer Defensive
RDIV
XLE
-
Communication Services
RDIV
XLE
-
Real Estate
RDIV
XLE
-
Healthcare
RDIV
XLE
-
Technology
RDIV
XLE
-
Utilities
RDIV
XLE
-
Basic Materials
RDIV
XLE
-
Industrials
RDIV
-
XLE
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RDIV vs. XLE — Risk / Return Rank
RDIV
XLE
RDIV vs. XLE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RDIV | XLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.30 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.30 | 3.10 | +3.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.74 | 8.63 | +10.11 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RDIV vs. XLE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RDIV drawdown since its inception was -49.97%, smaller than the maximum XLE drawdown of -71.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDIV and XLE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RDIV | XLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.97% | -71.26% | +21.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.84% | -12.05% | +7.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.91% | -20.14% | +2.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.89% | -26.04% | +1.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.97% | -66.81% | +16.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -8.01% | +8.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.85% | -17.97% | +12.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.64% | 4.32% | -2.68% |
Volatility
RDIV vs. XLE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV) is 3.52%, while State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) has a volatility of 7.26%. This indicates that RDIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RDIV | XLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.52% | 7.26% | -3.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.64% | 16.79% | -8.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.19% | 20.57% | -7.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.55% | 26.05% | -8.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.88% | 29.58% | -7.70% |
RDIV vs. XLE - Expense Ratio Comparison
RDIV has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than XLE's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
RDIV vs. XLE - Dividend Comparison
RDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.51%, more than XLE's 2.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RDIV Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF | 3.51% | 3.94% | 4.08% | 3.93% | 3.44% | 3.31% | 4.93% | 3.84% | 4.32% | 4.26% | 2.20% | 4.49% |
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 2.59% | 3.28% | 3.36% | 3.55% | 3.68% | 4.21% | 5.62% | 6.72% | 3.54% | 3.03% | 2.26% | 3.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RDIV and XLE have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLE has higher volatility (7.26%) compared to RDIV (3.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RDIV dropped -49.97% vs XLE's -71.26%.
On 10-year performance, RDIV leads with 11.39% vs 9.91% for XLE. On fees, XLE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, RDIV has been the lower-risk option at 3.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, RDIV has performed better with a 11.39% return vs 9.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for RDIV.
RDIV has the higher dividend yield at 3.51%, compared with 2.59% for XLE.
RDIV is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while XLE is Energy Equities. RDIV tracks S&P 900 Dividend Revenue-Weighted Index, while XLE tracks Energy Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for RDIV and 0.08% for XLE.
RDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RDIV and XLE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer