PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RDIV vs. VFVA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RDIV vs. VFVA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV) and Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF (VFVA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RDIV achieves a 11.95% return, which is significantly higher than VFVA's 9.50% return.


RDIV

1D
-1.30%
1M
2.29%
YTD
11.95%
6M
11.03%
1Y
27.04%
3Y*
19.26%
5Y*
10.04%
10Y*
10.95%

VFVA

1D
-1.33%
1M
0.94%
YTD
9.50%
6M
10.40%
1Y
28.50%
3Y*
17.34%
5Y*
9.48%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RDIV vs. VFVA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
RDIV
Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF
11.95%12.36%15.17%4.66%7.16%29.12%-9.31%22.62%-3.11%
VFVA
Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF
9.50%14.77%7.67%17.37%-3.96%36.94%2.28%25.42%-15.61%

Correlation

The correlation between RDIV and VFVA is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2018

0.88

The correlation between RDIV and VFVA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

RDIV vs. VFVA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RDIV
VFVA

Energy

28.8%
7.3%

Financial Services

18.0%
25.7%

Consumer Defensive

15.9%
7.1%

Consumer Cyclical

9.5%
13.1%

Real Estate

8.0%
0.4%

Healthcare

7.8%
14.9%

Utilities

6.4%

-

Technology

5.1%
14.5%

Basic Materials

0.5%
3.3%

Communication Services

-

6.2%

Industrials

-

7.6%

Energy

RDIV
28.8%
VFVA
7.3%

Financial Services

RDIV
18.0%
VFVA
25.7%

Consumer Defensive

RDIV
15.9%
VFVA
7.1%

Consumer Cyclical

RDIV
9.5%
VFVA
13.1%

Real Estate

RDIV
8.0%
VFVA
0.4%

Healthcare

RDIV
7.8%
VFVA
14.9%

Utilities

RDIV
6.4%
VFVA

-

Technology

RDIV
5.1%
VFVA
14.5%

Basic Materials

RDIV
0.5%
VFVA
3.3%

Communication Services

RDIV

-

VFVA
6.2%

Industrials

RDIV

-

VFVA
7.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RDIV vs. VFVA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RDIV
RDIV Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
RDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
RDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
RDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
RDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

VFVA
VFVA Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
VFVA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFVA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFVA Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
VFVA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFVA Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RDIV vs. VFVA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV) and Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF (VFVA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RDIVVFVADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.06

1.87

+0.18

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.07

2.76

+0.32

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.33

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.61

3.35

+2.26

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.50

10.61

+5.89

RDIV vs. VFVA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RDIV Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is comparable to the VFVA Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RDIV and VFVA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RDIVVFVADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.06

1.87

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.47

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.43

+0.12

Drawdowns

RDIV vs. VFVA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RDIV drawdown since its inception was -49.97%, roughly equal to the maximum VFVA drawdown of -48.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDIV and VFVA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RDIVVFVADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.97%

-48.58%

-1.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.84%

-8.55%

+3.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.91%

-24.07%

+6.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.89%

-24.07%

-0.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.65%

-1.51%

-0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.86%

-7.31%

+1.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.65%

2.69%

-1.04%

Volatility

RDIV vs. VFVA - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV) and Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF (VFVA) have volatilities of 3.46% and 3.36%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RDIVVFVADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.46%

3.36%

+0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.62%

9.81%

-1.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.23%

15.35%

-2.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.53%

20.18%

-2.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.89%

24.32%

-2.43%

RDIV vs. VFVA - Expense Ratio Comparison

RDIV has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than VFVA's 0.13% expense ratio.


Dividends

RDIV vs. VFVA - Dividend Comparison

RDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.66%, more than VFVA's 1.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RDIV
Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF
3.66%3.94%4.08%3.93%3.44%3.31%4.93%3.84%4.32%4.26%2.20%4.49%
VFVA
Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF
1.95%2.13%2.40%2.45%2.21%1.68%2.04%2.08%1.65%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RDIV and VFVA have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RDIV has higher volatility (3.46%) compared to VFVA (3.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RDIV dropped -49.97% vs VFVA's -48.58%.

On 5-year performance, RDIV leads with 10.04% vs 9.48% for VFVA. On fees, VFVA is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, VFVA has been the lower-risk option at 3.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, RDIV has performed better with a 10.04% return vs 9.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VFVA is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for RDIV.

RDIV has the higher dividend yield at 3.66%, compared with 1.95% for VFVA.

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for RDIV and 0.13% for VFVA.

RDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RDIV and VFVA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer