RDIV vs. VFVA
RDIV (Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF) and VFVA (Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds. RDIV is passively managed, while VFVA is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, RDIV returned 13.86%/yr vs 12.45%/yr for VFVA. Their correlation of 0.88 means they have usually moved in the same direction. RDIV charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for VFVA.
Performance
RDIV vs. VFVA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RDIV achieves a 22.74% return, which is significantly higher than VFVA's 19.47% return.
RDIV
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- 6.60%
- 6M
- 17.44%
- YTD
- 22.74%
- 1Y
- 36.48%
- 3Y*
- 19.58%
- 5Y*
- 13.86%
- 10Y*
- 11.30%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.74%
VFVA
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- 4.08%
- 6M
- 14.51%
- YTD
- 19.47%
- 1Y
- 37.96%
- 3Y*
- 16.39%
- 5Y*
- 12.45%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 10.75%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $3.34M | $2.84M | $4.35M | |
| $2.76M | $2.45M | $1.67M |
RDIV vs. VFVA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RDIV Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF | 22.74% | 12.36% | 15.17% | 4.66% | 7.16% | 29.12% | -9.31% | 22.62% | -1.80% |
VFVA Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF | 19.47% | 14.77% | 7.67% | 17.37% | -3.96% | 36.94% | 2.28% | 25.42% | -18.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between RDIV and VFVA is 0.79, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 15, 2018 | 0.88 |
The correlation between RDIV and VFVA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
RDIV vs. VFVA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RDIV
VFVA
Financial Services
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Real Estate
Healthcare
Utilities
-
Technology
Basic Materials
Industrials
-
Financial Services
RDIV
VFVA
Energy
RDIV
VFVA
Consumer Defensive
RDIV
VFVA
Consumer Cyclical
RDIV
VFVA
Communication Services
RDIV
VFVA
Real Estate
RDIV
VFVA
Healthcare
RDIV
VFVA
Utilities
RDIV
VFVA
-
Technology
RDIV
VFVA
Basic Materials
RDIV
VFVA
Industrials
RDIV
-
VFVA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RDIV vs. VFVA — Risk / Return Rank
RDIV
VFVA
RDIV vs. VFVA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV) and Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF (VFVA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RDIV | VFVA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.42 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.24 | 4.19 | +3.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.00 | 14.15 | +7.85 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RDIV vs. VFVA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RDIV drawdown since its inception was -49.97%, roughly equal to the maximum VFVA drawdown of -48.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDIV and VFVA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RDIV | VFVA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.97% | -48.58% | -1.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.84% | -8.55% | +3.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.91% | -24.07% | +6.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.89% | -24.07% | -0.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.97% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.46% | -1.29% | -0.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.80% | -7.24% | +1.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.59% | 2.52% | -0.93% |
Volatility
RDIV vs. VFVA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV) is 4.00%, while Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF (VFVA) has a volatility of 4.31%. This indicates that RDIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VFVA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RDIV | VFVA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.00% | 4.31% | -0.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.25% | 10.12% | -0.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.49% | 14.96% | -1.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.41% | 20.05% | -2.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.85% | 24.20% | -2.35% |
RDIV vs. VFVA - Expense Ratio Comparison
RDIV has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than VFVA's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
RDIV vs. VFVA - Dividend Comparison
RDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.45%, more than VFVA's 1.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RDIV Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF | 3.45% | 3.94% | 4.08% | 3.93% | 3.44% | 3.31% | 4.93% | 3.84% | 4.32% | 4.26% | 2.20% | 4.49% |
VFVA Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF | 1.77% | 2.13% | 2.40% | 2.45% | 2.21% | 1.68% | 2.04% | 2.08% | 1.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RDIV and VFVA have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VFVA has higher volatility (4.31%) compared to RDIV (4.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RDIV dropped -49.97% vs VFVA's -48.58%.
On 5-year performance, RDIV leads with 13.86% vs 12.45% for VFVA. On fees, VFVA is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, RDIV has been the lower-risk option at 4.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, RDIV has performed better with a 13.86% return vs 12.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VFVA is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for RDIV.
RDIV has the higher dividend yield at 3.45%, compared with 1.77% for VFVA.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for RDIV and 0.13% for VFVA.
RDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 2.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RDIV and VFVA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer