RDIV vs. QQQM
RDIV (Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF) and QQQM (Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RDIV is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P 900 Dividend Revenue-Weighted Index, while QQQM is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, RDIV returned 10.41%/yr vs 18.52%/yr for QQQM. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RDIV charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QQQM.
Performance
RDIV vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RDIV achieves a 13.43% return, which is significantly lower than QQQM's 21.64% return.
RDIV
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 2.82%
- YTD
- 13.43%
- 6M
- 12.91%
- 1Y
- 29.73%
- 3Y*
- 19.79%
- 5Y*
- 10.41%
- 10Y*
- 11.09%
QQQM
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 10.70%
- YTD
- 21.64%
- 6M
- 20.29%
- 1Y
- 43.37%
- 3Y*
- 28.98%
- 5Y*
- 18.52%
- 10Y*
- —
RDIV vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RDIV Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF | 13.43% | 12.36% | 15.17% | 4.66% | 7.16% | 29.12% | 22.85% |
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | 21.64% | 20.85% | 25.68% | 55.01% | -32.52% | 27.45% | 6.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between RDIV and QQQM is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2020 | 0.39 |
The correlation between RDIV and QQQM shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (1 year) to 0.43 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
RDIV vs. QQQM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RDIV
QQQM
Energy
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Healthcare
Utilities
Technology
Basic Materials
Communication Services
-
Industrials
-
Energy
RDIV
QQQM
Financial Services
RDIV
QQQM
Consumer Defensive
RDIV
QQQM
Consumer Cyclical
RDIV
QQQM
Real Estate
RDIV
QQQM
Healthcare
RDIV
QQQM
Utilities
RDIV
QQQM
Technology
RDIV
QQQM
Basic Materials
RDIV
QQQM
Communication Services
RDIV
-
QQQM
Industrials
RDIV
-
QQQM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RDIV vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank
RDIV
QQQM
RDIV vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RDIV | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.27 | 2.74 | -0.47 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.38 | 3.56 | -0.18 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.47 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.12 | 3.72 | +2.40 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.06 | 14.29 | +3.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RDIV | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.27 | 2.74 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 | 0.84 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.85 | -0.30 |
Drawdowns
RDIV vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RDIV drawdown since its inception was -49.97%, which is greater than QQQM's maximum drawdown of -35.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDIV and QQQM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RDIV | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.97% | -35.04% | -14.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.84% | -11.96% | +7.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.91% | -22.70% | +4.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.89% | -35.04% | +10.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.97% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.36% | 0.00% | -0.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.86% | -8.26% | +2.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.64% | 3.11% | -1.47% |
Volatility
RDIV vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV) is 3.28%, while Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) has a volatility of 4.47%. This indicates that RDIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RDIV | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.28% | 4.47% | -1.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.50% | 12.06% | -3.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.16% | 15.92% | -2.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.52% | 22.24% | -4.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.89% | 22.13% | -0.24% |
RDIV vs. QQQM - Expense Ratio Comparison
RDIV has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQM's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
RDIV vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison
RDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.61%, more than QQQM's 0.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | 0.41% | 0.50% | 0.61% | 0.65% | 0.83% | 0.40% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RDIV Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF | 3.61% | 3.94% | 4.08% | 3.93% | 3.44% | 3.31% | 4.93% | 3.84% | 4.32% | 4.26% | 2.20% | 4.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RDIV and QQQM have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QQQM has higher volatility (4.47%) compared to RDIV (3.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RDIV dropped -49.97% vs QQQM's -35.04%.
On 5-year performance, QQQM leads with 18.52% vs 10.41% for RDIV. On fees, QQQM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, RDIV has been the lower-risk option at 3.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QQQM has performed better with a 18.52% return vs 10.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for RDIV.
RDIV has the higher dividend yield at 3.61%, compared with 0.41% for QQQM.
RDIV is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while QQQM is Nasdaq-100. RDIV tracks S&P 900 Dividend Revenue-Weighted Index, while QQQM tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for RDIV and 0.15% for QQQM.
QQQM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 2.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RDIV and QQQM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer