RDIV vs. EQRR
RDIV (Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF) and EQRR (ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds - RDIV tracks the S&P 900 Dividend Revenue-Weighted Index while EQRR tracks the Nasdaq US Large Cap Equity Rising Rates Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, RDIV returned 13.86%/yr vs 13.84%/yr for EQRR. Their 0.66 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. RDIV charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for EQRR.
Performance
RDIV vs. EQRR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RDIV achieves a 22.74% return, which is significantly lower than EQRR's 29.00% return.
RDIV
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- 6.60%
- 6M
- 17.44%
- YTD
- 22.74%
- 1Y
- 36.48%
- 3Y*
- 19.58%
- 5Y*
- 13.86%
- 10Y*
- 11.30%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.74%
EQRR
- 1D
- 1.75%
- 1M
- 4.41%
- 6M
- 23.60%
- YTD
- 29.00%
- 1Y
- 40.33%
- 3Y*
- 17.69%
- 5Y*
- 13.84%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 10.68%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $235.70K | $533.46K | $2.90M | |
| $3.34M | $2.84M | $4.35M |
RDIV vs. EQRR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RDIV Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF | 22.74% | 12.36% | 15.17% | 4.66% | 7.16% | 29.12% | -9.31% | 22.62% | -4.78% | 12.36% |
EQRR ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF | 29.00% | 15.49% | 7.69% | 9.19% | 2.20% | 36.11% | -10.14% | 19.57% | -18.60% | 17.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between RDIV and EQRR is 0.49, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.70 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2017 | 0.66 |
The correlation between RDIV and EQRR shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (1 year) to 0.72 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
RDIV vs. EQRR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RDIV
EQRR
Financial Services
Energy
Consumer Defensive
-
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
Healthcare
-
Utilities
-
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Industrials
-
Financial Services
RDIV
EQRR
Energy
RDIV
EQRR
Consumer Defensive
RDIV
EQRR
-
Consumer Cyclical
RDIV
EQRR
Communication Services
RDIV
EQRR
Real Estate
RDIV
EQRR
-
Healthcare
RDIV
EQRR
-
Utilities
RDIV
EQRR
-
Technology
RDIV
EQRR
Basic Materials
RDIV
EQRR
-
Industrials
RDIV
-
EQRR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RDIV vs. EQRR — Risk / Return Rank
RDIV
EQRR
RDIV vs. EQRR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV) and ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF (EQRR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RDIV | EQRR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.46 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.24 | 7.73 | -0.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.00 | 26.43 | -4.43 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RDIV vs. EQRR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RDIV drawdown since its inception was -49.97%, smaller than the maximum EQRR drawdown of -57.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDIV and EQRR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RDIV | EQRR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.97% | -57.93% | +7.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.84% | -4.95% | +0.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.91% | -17.75% | -0.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.89% | -21.75% | -3.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.97% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.46% | 0.00% | -1.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.80% | -9.93% | +4.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.59% | 1.45% | +0.14% |
Volatility
RDIV vs. EQRR - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV) has a higher volatility of 4.00% compared to ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF (EQRR) at 3.47%. This indicates that RDIV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EQRR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RDIV | EQRR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.00% | 3.47% | +0.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.25% | 11.86% | -2.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.49% | 14.98% | -1.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.41% | 21.22% | -3.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.85% | 24.77% | -2.92% |
RDIV vs. EQRR - Expense Ratio Comparison
RDIV has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than EQRR's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
RDIV vs. EQRR - Dividend Comparison
RDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.45%, more than EQRR's 1.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQRR ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF | 1.07% | 1.70% | 2.17% | 2.77% | 2.34% | 1.71% | 2.17% | 2.05% | 2.47% | 0.69% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RDIV Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF | 3.45% | 3.94% | 4.08% | 3.93% | 3.44% | 3.31% | 4.93% | 3.84% | 4.32% | 4.26% | 2.20% | 4.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RDIV and EQRR have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RDIV has higher volatility (4.00%) compared to EQRR (3.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RDIV dropped -49.97% vs EQRR's -57.93%.
On 5-year performance, RDIV leads with 13.86% vs 13.84% for EQRR. On fees, EQRR is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, EQRR has been the lower-risk option at 3.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, RDIV has performed better with a 13.86% return vs 13.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EQRR is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for RDIV.
RDIV has the higher dividend yield at 3.45%, compared with 1.07% for EQRR.
RDIV tracks S&P 900 Dividend Revenue-Weighted Index, while EQRR tracks Nasdaq US Large Cap Equity Rising Rates Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for RDIV and 0.35% for EQRR.
RDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 2.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RDIV and EQRR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer