RDIV vs. COWZ
RDIV (Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF) and COWZ (Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds - RDIV tracks the S&P 900 Dividend Revenue-Weighted Index while COWZ tracks the Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, RDIV returned 10.41%/yr vs 10.74%/yr for COWZ. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RDIV charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for COWZ.
Performance
RDIV vs. COWZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RDIV achieves a 13.43% return, which is significantly higher than COWZ's 8.55% return.
RDIV
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 2.82%
- YTD
- 13.43%
- 6M
- 12.91%
- 1Y
- 29.73%
- 3Y*
- 19.79%
- 5Y*
- 10.41%
- 10Y*
- 11.09%
COWZ
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- 2.47%
- YTD
- 8.55%
- 6M
- 10.68%
- 1Y
- 24.00%
- 3Y*
- 14.57%
- 5Y*
- 10.74%
- 10Y*
- —
RDIV vs. COWZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RDIV Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF | 13.43% | 12.36% | 15.17% | 4.66% | 7.16% | 29.12% | -9.31% | 22.62% | -4.78% | 11.63% |
COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF | 8.55% | 8.98% | 10.64% | 14.73% | 0.19% | 42.57% | 11.65% | 23.41% | -10.05% | 20.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between RDIV and COWZ is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2016 | 0.82 |
The correlation between RDIV and COWZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
RDIV vs. COWZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RDIV
COWZ
Energy
Financial Services
-
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
-
Healthcare
Utilities
-
Technology
Basic Materials
Communication Services
-
Industrials
-
Energy
RDIV
COWZ
Financial Services
RDIV
COWZ
-
Consumer Defensive
RDIV
COWZ
Consumer Cyclical
RDIV
COWZ
Real Estate
RDIV
COWZ
-
Healthcare
RDIV
COWZ
Utilities
RDIV
COWZ
-
Technology
RDIV
COWZ
Basic Materials
RDIV
COWZ
Communication Services
RDIV
-
COWZ
Industrials
RDIV
-
COWZ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RDIV vs. COWZ — Risk / Return Rank
RDIV
COWZ
RDIV vs. COWZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RDIV | COWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.27 | 2.17 | +0.10 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.38 | 3.19 | +0.19 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.38 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.12 | 4.83 | +1.29 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.06 | 13.22 | +4.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RDIV | COWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.27 | 2.17 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 | 0.61 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.65 | -0.10 |
Drawdowns
RDIV vs. COWZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RDIV drawdown since its inception was -49.97%, which is greater than COWZ's maximum drawdown of -38.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDIV and COWZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RDIV | COWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.97% | -38.63% | -11.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.84% | -5.00% | +0.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.91% | -22.00% | +4.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.89% | -22.00% | -2.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.97% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.36% | -0.57% | +0.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.86% | -4.81% | -1.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.64% | 1.83% | -0.19% |
Volatility
RDIV vs. COWZ - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV) has a higher volatility of 3.28% compared to Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) at 2.59%. This indicates that RDIV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COWZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RDIV | COWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.28% | 2.59% | +0.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.50% | 7.12% | +1.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.16% | 11.12% | +2.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.52% | 17.63% | -0.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.89% | 19.93% | +1.96% |
RDIV vs. COWZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
RDIV has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than COWZ's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
RDIV vs. COWZ - Dividend Comparison
RDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.61%, more than COWZ's 1.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF | 1.98% | 2.19% | 1.82% | 1.92% | 1.96% | 1.48% | 2.54% | 1.96% | 1.67% | 1.95% | 0.13% | 0.00% |
RDIV Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF | 3.61% | 3.94% | 4.08% | 3.93% | 3.44% | 3.31% | 4.93% | 3.84% | 4.32% | 4.26% | 2.20% | 4.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RDIV and COWZ have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RDIV has higher volatility (3.28%) compared to COWZ (2.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RDIV dropped -49.97% vs COWZ's -38.63%.
On 5-year performance, COWZ leads with 10.74% vs 10.41% for RDIV. On fees, RDIV is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, COWZ has been the lower-risk option at 2.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, COWZ has performed better with a 10.74% return vs 10.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RDIV is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for COWZ.
RDIV has the higher dividend yield at 3.61%, compared with 1.98% for COWZ.
RDIV tracks S&P 900 Dividend Revenue-Weighted Index, while COWZ tracks Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for RDIV and 0.49% for COWZ.
RDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RDIV and COWZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer