RDIV vs. ABLD
RDIV (Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF) and ABLD (Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds - RDIV tracks the S&P 900 Dividend Revenue-Weighted Index while ABLD tracks the FCF Yield Enhanced Real Asset Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, RDIV returned 19.58%/yr vs 9.40%/yr for ABLD. Their 0.74 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. Both charge a 0.39% expense ratio.
Performance
RDIV vs. ABLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RDIV achieves a 22.74% return, which is significantly higher than ABLD's 8.56% return.
RDIV
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- 6.60%
- 6M
- 17.44%
- YTD
- 22.74%
- 1Y
- 36.48%
- 3Y*
- 19.58%
- 5Y*
- 13.86%
- 10Y*
- 11.30%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.74%
ABLD
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 3.14%
- 6M
- 1.06%
- YTD
- 8.56%
- 1Y
- 12.72%
- 3Y*
- 9.40%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 11.34%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $255.09K | $266.40K | $366.51K | |
| $3.34M | $2.84M | $4.35M |
RDIV vs. ABLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RDIV Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF | 22.74% | 12.36% | 15.17% | 4.66% | 7.16% | 3.87% |
ABLD Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF | 8.56% | 6.64% | 7.05% | 18.89% | 7.42% | 3.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between RDIV and ABLD is 0.47, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2021 | 0.74 |
Over the past year, the correlation between RDIV and ABLD has dropped to 0.47 - well below their long-term average of 0.74, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RDIV vs. ABLD — Risk / Return Rank
RDIV
ABLD
RDIV vs. ABLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV) and Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF (ABLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RDIV | ABLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.16 | +0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.24 | 1.04 | +6.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.00 | 2.42 | +19.58 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RDIV vs. ABLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RDIV drawdown since its inception was -49.97%, which is greater than ABLD's maximum drawdown of -19.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDIV and ABLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RDIV | ABLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.97% | -19.35% | -30.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.84% | -11.64% | +6.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.91% | -19.35% | +1.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.89% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.97% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.46% | -7.34% | +5.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.80% | -4.14% | -1.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.59% | 4.99% | -3.40% |
Volatility
RDIV vs. ABLD - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV) has a higher volatility of 4.00% compared to Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF (ABLD) at 2.62%. This indicates that RDIV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ABLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RDIV | ABLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.00% | 2.62% | +1.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.25% | 12.91% | -3.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.49% | 14.94% | -1.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.41% | 17.36% | +0.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.85% | 17.36% | +4.49% |
RDIV vs. ABLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both RDIV and ABLD have an expense ratio of 0.39%.
Dividends
RDIV vs. ABLD - Dividend Comparison
RDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.45%, less than ABLD's 3.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABLD Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF | 3.54% | 2.86% | 10.13% | 4.70% | 8.40% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RDIV Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF | 3.45% | 3.94% | 4.08% | 3.93% | 3.44% | 3.31% | 4.93% | 3.84% | 4.32% | 4.26% | 2.20% | 4.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RDIV and ABLD have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RDIV has higher volatility (4.00%) compared to ABLD (2.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RDIV dropped -49.97% vs ABLD's -19.35%.
On 3-year performance, RDIV leads with 19.58% vs 9.40% for ABLD. Both ETFs have the same 0.39% expense ratio. On volatility, ABLD has been the lower-risk option at 2.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, RDIV has performed better with a 19.58% return vs 9.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RDIV and ABLD have the same expense ratio: 0.39% per year.
ABLD has the higher dividend yield at 3.54%, compared with 3.45% for RDIV.
RDIV tracks S&P 900 Dividend Revenue-Weighted Index, while ABLD tracks FCF Yield Enhanced Real Asset Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Abacus.
RDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RDIV and ABLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer