RDIV vs. ABLD

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

RDIV (Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF) and ABLD (Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds - RDIV tracks the S&P 900 Dividend Revenue-Weighted Index while ABLD tracks the FCF Yield Enhanced Real Asset Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, RDIV returned 19.82%/yr vs 11.30%/yr for ABLD. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.39% expense ratio.

Performance

RDIV vs. ABLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV) and Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF (ABLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RDIV achieves a 13.79% return, which is significantly higher than ABLD's 4.86% return.

RDIV

• 1D: 1.18%
• 1M: 0.13%
• YTD: 13.79%
• 6M: 13.59%
• 1Y: 28.68%
• 3Y*: 19.82%
• 5Y*: 11.36%
• 10Y*: 11.03%

ABLD

• 1D: -0.69%
• 1M: -3.79%
• YTD: 4.86%
• 6M: 4.29%
• 1Y: 9.80%
• 3Y*: 11.30%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RDIV vs. ABLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
RDIV Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF	13.79%	12.36%	15.17%	4.66%	7.16%	3.87%
ABLD Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF	4.86%	6.64%	7.05%	18.89%	7.42%	3.86%

Correlation

The correlation between RDIV and ABLD is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.57
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.71
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2021	0.75

The correlation between RDIV and ABLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (1 year) to 0.75 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

RDIV vs. ABLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RDIV

RDIV Risk / Return Rank: 78
RDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
RDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
RDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 66
RDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
RDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 85

ABLD

ABLD Risk / Return Rank: 20
ABLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
ABLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
ABLD Omega Ratio Rank: 19
ABLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
ABLD Martin Ratio Rank: 21

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RDIV vs. ABLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV) and Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF (ABLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RDIV	ABLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.15	0.65	+1.50
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.15	0.97	+2.18
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.13	+0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.95	0.85	+5.10
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.00	2.48	+14.52

RDIV vs. ABLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RDIV Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is higher than the ABLD Sharpe Ratio of 0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RDIV and ABLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RDIV vs. ABLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RDIV drawdown since its inception was -49.97%, which is greater than ABLD's maximum drawdown of -19.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDIV and ABLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	RDIV	ABLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-49.97%	-19.35%	-30.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.84%	-11.64%	+6.80%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.91%	-19.35%	+1.44%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.89%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-49.97%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.54%	-10.50%	+7.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.84%	-4.02%	-1.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.69%	3.97%	-2.28%

Volatility

RDIV vs. ABLD - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV) has a higher volatility of 4.58% compared to Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF (ABLD) at 4.19%. This indicates that RDIV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ABLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RDIV	ABLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.58%	4.19%	+0.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.01%	13.19%	-4.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.41%	15.07%	-1.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.48%	17.50%	-0.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.89%	17.50%	+4.39%

RDIV vs. ABLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both RDIV and ABLD have an expense ratio of 0.39%.

Dividends

RDIV vs. ABLD - Dividend Comparison

RDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.72%, less than ABLD's 4.35% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ABLD Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF	4.35%	2.86%	10.13%	4.70%	8.40%	0.08%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RDIV Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF	3.72%	3.94%	4.08%	3.93%	3.44%	3.31%	4.93%	3.84%	4.32%	4.26%	2.20%	4.49%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RDIV and ABLD in my portfolio?

RDIV and ABLD have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RDIV or ABLD?

RDIV has higher volatility (4.58%) compared to ABLD (4.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RDIV dropped -49.97% vs ABLD's -19.35%.

Which ETF is better, RDIV or ABLD?

On 3-year performance, RDIV leads with 19.82% vs 11.30% for ABLD. Both ETFs have the same 0.39% expense ratio. On volatility, ABLD has been the lower-risk option at 4.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RDIV or ABLD?

Over the 3-year period, RDIV has performed better with a 19.82% return vs 11.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RDIV or ABLD?

RDIV and ABLD have the same expense ratio: 0.39% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RDIV or ABLD?

ABLD has the higher dividend yield at 4.35%, compared with 3.72% for RDIV.

What is the main difference between RDIV and ABLD?

RDIV tracks S&P 900 Dividend Revenue-Weighted Index, while ABLD tracks FCF Yield Enhanced Real Asset Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Abacus.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.