RCTR vs. POW

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

RCTR (First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF) and POW (VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RCTR is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Bloomberg Nuclear Power Index, while POW is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by VistaShares. RCTR is passively managed, while POW is actively managed. Their 0.73 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. RCTR charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for POW.

Performance

RCTR vs. POW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF (RCTR) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RCTR achieves a 0.61% return, which is significantly lower than POW's 31.51% return.

RCTR

• 1D: -0.68%
• 1M: -2.79%
• 6M: -9.50%
• YTD: 0.61%
• 1Y: 9.71%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 7.30%

POW

• 1D: 0.90%
• 1M: -10.55%
• 6M: 14.53%
• YTD: 31.51%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF	$1.21M	$2.19M	$3.04M
RCTR First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF	$83.08K	$122.59K	$254.75K

RCTR vs. POW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RCTR First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF	0.61%	-7.88%
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF	31.51%	-1.70%

Correlation

The correlation between RCTR and POW is 0.73, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025	0.73

Return for Risk

RCTR vs. POW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RCTR

RCTR Risk / Return Rank: 18
RCTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
RCTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
RCTR Omega Ratio Rank: 17
RCTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
RCTR Martin Ratio Rank: 18

POW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RCTR vs. POW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF (RCTR) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RCTR	POW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.30	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.60	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.42	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.00	—	—

Drawdowns

RCTR vs. POW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RCTR drawdown since its inception was -18.98%, smaller than the maximum POW drawdown of -28.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RCTR and POW.

Drawdown Indicators

	RCTR	POW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.98%	-28.02%	+9.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.98%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-16.26%	-22.73%	+6.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.09%	-5.52%	-0.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.86%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RCTR	POW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.98%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.49%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.82%	34.38%	-7.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.82%	34.38%	-7.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.82%	34.38%	-7.56%

RCTR vs. POW - Expense Ratio Comparison

RCTR has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than POW's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

RCTR vs. POW - Dividend Comparison

RCTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%, more than POW's 0.15% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF	0.15%	0.19%
RCTR First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF	0.64%	0.36%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RCTR and POW in my portfolio?

RCTR and POW have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RCTR or POW?

On fees, RCTR is cheaper at 0.70% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RCTR or POW?

RCTR is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for POW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RCTR or POW?

RCTR has the higher dividend yield at 0.64%, compared with 0.15% for POW.

What is the main difference between RCTR and POW?

RCTR is categorized as Energy Equities, while POW is Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for RCTR and 0.75% for POW.