RCTR vs. HAP
RCTR (First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF) and HAP (VanEck Natural Resources ETF) are both Energy Equities funds - RCTR tracks the Bloomberg Nuclear Power Index while HAP tracks the MarketVector Global Natural Resources Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RCTR charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for HAP.
Performance
RCTR vs. HAP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RCTR achieves a 5.47% return, which is significantly lower than HAP's 12.65% return.
RCTR
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- -4.85%
- YTD
- 5.47%
- 6M
- 2.65%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HAP
- 1D
- -1.17%
- 1M
- -6.40%
- YTD
- 12.65%
- 6M
- 12.15%
- 1Y
- 33.80%
- 3Y*
- 16.09%
- 5Y*
- 10.78%
- 10Y*
- 11.46%
RCTR vs. HAP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RCTR First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF | 5.47% | 6.65% |
HAP VanEck Natural Resources ETF | 12.65% | 17.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between RCTR and HAP is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2025 | 0.56 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RCTR vs. HAP — Risk / Return Rank
RCTR
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
HAP
RCTR vs. HAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF (RCTR) and VanEck Natural Resources ETF (HAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RCTR | HAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.39 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.74 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 13.77 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RCTR vs. HAP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RCTR drawdown since its inception was -16.86%, smaller than the maximum HAP drawdown of -50.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RCTR and HAP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RCTR | HAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.86% | -50.99% | +34.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.09% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.92% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.66% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.21% | -9.09% | -3.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.05% | -12.06% | +7.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.46% | — |
Volatility
RCTR vs. HAP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RCTR | HAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.33% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 13.02% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.99% | 15.70% | +11.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.99% | 18.27% | +8.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.99% | 19.69% | +7.30% |
RCTR vs. HAP - Expense Ratio Comparison
RCTR has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than HAP's 0.42% expense ratio.
Dividends
RCTR vs. HAP - Dividend Comparison
RCTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%, less than HAP's 2.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HAP VanEck Natural Resources ETF | 2.01% | 2.27% | 2.65% | 3.27% | 3.28% | 2.16% | 2.45% | 2.80% | 2.85% | 2.02% | 1.99% | 3.00% |
RCTR First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF | 0.42% | 0.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RCTR and HAP have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HAP is cheaper at 0.42% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HAP is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for RCTR.
HAP has the higher dividend yield at 2.01%, compared with 0.42% for RCTR.
RCTR tracks Bloomberg Nuclear Power Index, while HAP tracks MarketVector Global Natural Resources Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for RCTR and 0.42% for HAP.
Find the right allocation for RCTR and HAP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer