RCTR vs. HAP

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

RCTR (First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF) and HAP (VanEck Natural Resources ETF) are both Energy Equities funds - RCTR tracks the Bloomberg Nuclear Power Index while HAP tracks the MarketVector Global Natural Resources Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RCTR charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for HAP.

Performance

RCTR vs. HAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF (RCTR) and VanEck Natural Resources ETF (HAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RCTR achieves a 8.96% return, which is significantly lower than HAP's 21.52% return.

RCTR

• 1D: 0.19%
• 1M: -6.46%
• YTD: 8.96%
• 6M: 4.46%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HAP

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: -0.23%
• YTD: 21.52%
• 6M: 23.43%
• 1Y: 47.01%
• 3Y*: 19.18%
• 5Y*: 11.51%
• 10Y*: 11.82%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RCTR vs. HAP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RCTR First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF	8.96%	7.23%
HAP VanEck Natural Resources ETF	21.52%	17.40%

Correlation

The correlation between RCTR and HAP is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2025	0.55

Return for Risk

RCTR vs. HAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HAP

HAP Risk / Return Rank: 90
HAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
HAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
HAP Omega Ratio Rank: 90
HAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
HAP Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RCTR vs. HAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF (RCTR) and VanEck Natural Resources ETF (HAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RCTR	HAP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	3.17	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.63	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.60	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.76	0.26	+0.50

Drawdowns

RCTR vs. HAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RCTR drawdown since its inception was -14.66%, smaller than the maximum HAP drawdown of -50.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RCTR and HAP.

Drawdown Indicators

	RCTR	HAP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.66%	-50.73%	+36.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-8.31%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-16.92%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-25.66%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-44.07%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.31%	-1.93%	-7.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.63%	-12.03%	+7.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.03%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RCTR	HAP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.27%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	12.23%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.62%	14.91%	+11.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.62%	18.24%	+8.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.62%	19.73%	+6.89%

RCTR vs. HAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

RCTR has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than HAP's 0.42% expense ratio.

Dividends

RCTR vs. HAP - Dividend Comparison

RCTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%, less than HAP's 1.87% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HAP VanEck Natural Resources ETF	1.87%	2.27%	2.65%	3.27%	3.28%	2.16%	2.45%	2.80%	2.85%	2.02%	1.99%	3.00%
RCTR First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF	0.41%	0.36%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RCTR and HAP in my portfolio?

RCTR and HAP have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RCTR or HAP?

On fees, HAP is cheaper at 0.42% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RCTR or HAP?

HAP is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for RCTR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RCTR or HAP?

HAP has the higher dividend yield at 1.87%, compared with 0.41% for RCTR.

What is the main difference between RCTR and HAP?

RCTR tracks Bloomberg Nuclear Power Index, while HAP tracks MarketVector Global Natural Resources Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for RCTR and 0.42% for HAP.