RCTR vs. EIPX

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

RCTR (First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF) and EIPX (FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF) are both Energy Equities funds from First Trust. RCTR is passively managed, while EIPX is actively managed. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RCTR charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for EIPX.

Performance

RCTR vs. EIPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF (RCTR) and FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF (EIPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RCTR achieves a 5.47% return, which is significantly lower than EIPX's 19.56% return.

RCTR

• 1D: -0.93%
• 1M: -4.85%
• YTD: 5.47%
• 6M: 2.65%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EIPX

• 1D: -1.13%
• 1M: -4.27%
• YTD: 19.56%
• 6M: 19.65%
• 1Y: 25.85%
• 3Y*: 20.79%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RCTR vs. EIPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RCTR First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF	5.47%	6.65%
EIPX FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF	19.56%	2.90%

Correlation

The correlation between RCTR and EIPX is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2025	0.16

Return for Risk

RCTR vs. EIPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RCTR

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

EIPX

EIPX Risk / Return Rank: 83
EIPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
EIPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
EIPX Omega Ratio Rank: 75
EIPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
EIPX Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RCTR vs. EIPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF (RCTR) and FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF (EIPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RCTR	EIPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.32	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.30	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.39	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	5.02	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	15.27	—

Drawdowns

RCTR vs. EIPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RCTR drawdown since its inception was -16.86%, which is greater than EIPX's maximum drawdown of -15.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RCTR and EIPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	RCTR	EIPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.86%	-15.43%	-1.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-5.17%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-15.43%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.21%	-4.50%	-7.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.05%	-2.29%	-2.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.70%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RCTR	EIPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.69%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	8.54%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.99%	11.19%	+15.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.99%	15.02%	+11.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.99%	15.02%	+11.97%

RCTR vs. EIPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RCTR has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than EIPX's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

RCTR vs. EIPX - Dividend Comparison

RCTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%, less than EIPX's 2.73% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
EIPX FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF	2.73%	3.23%	3.27%	3.48%	0.34%
RCTR First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF	0.42%	0.36%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RCTR and EIPX in my portfolio?

RCTR and EIPX have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RCTR or EIPX?

On fees, RCTR is cheaper at 0.70% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RCTR or EIPX?

RCTR is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for EIPX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RCTR or EIPX?

EIPX has the higher dividend yield at 2.73%, compared with 0.42% for RCTR.

What is the main difference between RCTR and EIPX?

Their fees differ too: 0.70% for RCTR and 0.95% for EIPX.