RCTIX vs. FCFAX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

RCTIX (River Canyon Total Return Bond Fund) and FCFAX (Frost Credit Fund) are both Short-Term Bond funds. Over the past 10 years, RCTIX returned 5.54%/yr vs 5.21%/yr for FCFAX. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RCTIX charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.96%/yr for FCFAX.

Performance

RCTIX vs. FCFAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in River Canyon Total Return Bond Fund (RCTIX) and Frost Credit Fund (FCFAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RCTIX achieves a 0.71% return, which is significantly lower than FCFAX's 1.47% return. Over the past 10 years, RCTIX has outperformed FCFAX with an annualized return of 5.54%, while FCFAX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.21% annualized return.

RCTIX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.20%
• YTD: 0.71%
• 6M: 1.26%
• 1Y: 5.24%
• 3Y*: 7.47%
• 5Y*: 4.38%
• 10Y*: 5.54%

FCFAX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.72%
• YTD: 1.47%
• 6M: 1.23%
• 1Y: 5.12%
• 3Y*: 7.27%
• 5Y*: 3.83%
• 10Y*: 5.21%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RCTIX vs. FCFAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RCTIX River Canyon Total Return Bond Fund	0.71%	7.75%	7.49%	10.02%	-4.07%	4.26%	6.42%	11.71%	1.82%	9.76%
FCFAX Frost Credit Fund	1.47%	5.21%	8.01%	11.23%	-7.83%	5.07%	6.22%	6.95%	0.89%	7.95%

Correlation

The correlation between RCTIX and FCFAX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.76
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.76
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.69
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.48
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2015	0.44

Over the past year, RCTIX and FCFAX have become more correlated (0.76) than their long-term average of 0.44, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

RCTIX vs. FCFAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RCTIX

RCTIX Risk / Return Rank: 74
RCTIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
RCTIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
RCTIX Omega Ratio Rank: 72
RCTIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
RCTIX Martin Ratio Rank: 78

FCFAX

FCFAX Risk / Return Rank: 63
FCFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
FCFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
FCFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 70
FCFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
FCFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RCTIX vs. FCFAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for River Canyon Total Return Bond Fund (RCTIX) and Frost Credit Fund (FCFAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RCTIX	FCFAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.32	2.34	-0.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.49	3.58	-0.09
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	1.47	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.39	2.89	+1.50
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.63	10.81	+3.82
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RCTIX vs. FCFAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RCTIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is comparable to the FCFAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RCTIX and FCFAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RCTIX	FCFAX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.32	2.34	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.77	1.39	+0.38
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.49	1.61	-0.13
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.31	1.45	-0.14

Drawdowns

RCTIX vs. FCFAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RCTIX drawdown since its inception was -10.89%, smaller than the maximum FCFAX drawdown of -16.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RCTIX and FCFAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	RCTIX	FCFAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.89%	-16.33%	+5.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.20%	-1.82%	+0.62%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-1.48%	-2.82%	+1.34%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-6.17%	-10.49%	+4.32%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-10.89%	-16.33%	+5.44%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.11%	0.00%	-0.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.08%	-1.53%	+0.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.36%	0.48%	-0.12%

Volatility

RCTIX vs. FCFAX - Volatility Comparison

River Canyon Total Return Bond Fund (RCTIX) and Frost Credit Fund (FCFAX) have volatilities of 0.83% and 0.81%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RCTIX	FCFAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.83%	0.81%	+0.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.76%	1.74%	+0.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.28%	2.26%	+0.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.49%	2.76%	-0.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.74%	3.24%	+0.50%

RCTIX vs. FCFAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RCTIX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is lower than FCFAX's 0.96% expense ratio.

Dividends

RCTIX vs. FCFAX - Dividend Comparison

RCTIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.27%, more than FCFAX's 6.16% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FCFAX Frost Credit Fund	6.16%	6.10%	5.76%	5.93%	5.00%	3.65%	3.69%	4.62%	5.05%	5.85%	4.84%	4.95%
RCTIX River Canyon Total Return Bond Fund	7.27%	7.31%	7.89%	8.50%	5.98%	3.02%	5.97%	4.97%	3.30%	4.89%	2.16%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RCTIX and FCFAX in my portfolio?

RCTIX and FCFAX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RCTIX or FCFAX?

RCTIX has higher volatility (0.83%) compared to FCFAX (0.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RCTIX dropped -10.89% vs FCFAX's -16.33%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FCFAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 2.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.