FCFAX vs. SRVR
Compare and contrast key facts about Frost Credit Fund (FCFAX) and Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF (SRVR).
FCFAX is managed by Frost Funds. It was launched on Dec 3, 2012. SRVR is a passively managed fund by Pacer Advisors that tracks the performance of the Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR Index. It was launched on May 15, 2018.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FCFAX or SRVR.
Key characteristics
FCFAX | SRVR | |
---|---|---|
YTD Return | 7.59% | 4.71% |
1Y Return | 11.73% | 13.29% |
3Y Return (Ann) | 3.41% | -6.75% |
5Y Return (Ann) | 4.51% | 1.91% |
Sharpe Ratio | 4.79 | 1.17 |
Sortino Ratio | 8.09 | 1.71 |
Omega Ratio | 2.13 | 1.22 |
Calmar Ratio | 9.00 | 0.53 |
Martin Ratio | 41.27 | 3.69 |
Ulcer Index | 0.30% | 5.20% |
Daily Std Dev | 2.58% | 16.35% |
Max Drawdown | -16.33% | -40.99% |
Current Drawdown | -0.57% | -23.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between FCFAX and SRVR is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
FCFAX vs. SRVR - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, FCFAX achieves a 7.59% return, which is significantly higher than SRVR's 4.71% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FCFAX vs. SRVR - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCFAX has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than SRVR's 0.60% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FCFAX vs. SRVR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Frost Credit Fund (FCFAX) and Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF (SRVR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FCFAX vs. SRVR - Dividend Comparison
FCFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.81%, more than SRVR's 1.85% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Frost Credit Fund | 5.81% | 5.95% | 4.99% | 3.64% | 3.70% | 4.63% | 4.68% | 4.60% | 4.85% | 4.96% | 4.56% | 3.81% |
Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF | 1.85% | 3.69% | 1.70% | 1.19% | 1.58% | 1.61% | 2.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FCFAX vs. SRVR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCFAX drawdown since its inception was -16.33%, smaller than the maximum SRVR drawdown of -40.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCFAX and SRVR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FCFAX vs. SRVR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Frost Credit Fund (FCFAX) is 0.82%, while Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF (SRVR) has a volatility of 5.77%. This indicates that FCFAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SRVR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.