RCTIX vs. EARRX
Compare and contrast key facts about River Canyon Total Return Bond Fund (RCTIX) and Eaton Vance Short Duration Inflation-Protected Income Fund Class A (EARRX).
RCTIX is managed by River Canyon. It was launched on Dec 30, 2014. EARRX is managed by Eaton Vance. It was launched on Mar 31, 2010.
Performance
RCTIX vs. EARRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RCTIX vs. EARRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RCTIX River Canyon Total Return Bond Fund | -0.97% | 7.75% | 7.49% | 10.02% | -4.07% | 4.26% | 6.42% | 11.71% | 1.82% | 9.76% |
EARRX Eaton Vance Short Duration Inflation-Protected Income Fund Class A | 0.28% | 5.46% | 5.39% | 5.95% | -3.22% | 7.50% | 5.05% | 5.29% | -0.49% | 1.81% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RCTIX achieves a -0.97% return, which is significantly lower than EARRX's 0.28% return. Over the past 10 years, RCTIX has outperformed EARRX with an annualized return of 5.54%, while EARRX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.60% annualized return.
RCTIX
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- -1.50%
- YTD
- -0.97%
- 6M
- 0.18%
- 1Y
- 4.55%
- 3Y*
- 7.05%
- 5Y*
- 4.20%
- 10Y*
- 5.54%
EARRX
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- -0.21%
- YTD
- 0.28%
- 6M
- 0.32%
- 1Y
- 2.98%
- 3Y*
- 4.81%
- 5Y*
- 3.78%
- 10Y*
- 3.60%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RCTIX vs. EARRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RCTIX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than EARRX's 0.85% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RCTIX vs. EARRX — Risk / Return Rank
RCTIX
EARRX
RCTIX vs. EARRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for River Canyon Total Return Bond Fund (RCTIX) and Eaton Vance Short Duration Inflation-Protected Income Fund Class A (EARRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RCTIX | EARRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.94 | 1.60 | +0.34 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.81 | 2.29 | +0.52 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.36 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.10 | 2.76 | +0.33 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.23 | 12.19 | +0.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RCTIX | EARRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.94 | 1.60 | +0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.71 | 1.37 | +0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.49 | 1.33 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.29 | 1.04 | +0.24 |
Correlation
The correlation between RCTIX and EARRX is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
RCTIX vs. EARRX - Dividend Comparison
RCTIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.83%, more than EARRX's 3.87% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RCTIX River Canyon Total Return Bond Fund | 6.83% | 7.31% | 7.89% | 8.50% | 5.98% | 3.02% | 5.97% | 4.97% | 3.30% | 4.89% | 2.16% | 0.00% |
EARRX Eaton Vance Short Duration Inflation-Protected Income Fund Class A | 3.87% | 4.36% | 3.83% | 4.24% | 4.82% | 3.32% | 2.02% | 2.46% | 2.67% | 1.90% | 2.00% | 1.73% |
Drawdowns
RCTIX vs. EARRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RCTIX drawdown since its inception was -10.89%, which is greater than EARRX's maximum drawdown of -10.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RCTIX and EARRX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RCTIX | EARRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.89% | -10.27% | -0.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.50% | -1.18% | -0.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -6.17% | -6.39% | +0.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -10.89% | -10.27% | -0.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.50% | -0.51% | -0.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.09% | -1.09% | 0.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.38% | 0.27% | +0.11% |
Volatility
RCTIX vs. EARRX - Volatility Comparison
River Canyon Total Return Bond Fund (RCTIX) has a higher volatility of 0.91% compared to Eaton Vance Short Duration Inflation-Protected Income Fund Class A (EARRX) at 0.58%. This indicates that RCTIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EARRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RCTIX | EARRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.91% | 0.58% | +0.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.59% | 1.05% | +0.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.31% | 1.87% | +0.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.47% | 2.78% | -0.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.74% | 2.71% | +1.03% |