PortfoliosLab logo
FCFAX vs. FSMEX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FCFAX and FSMEX is 0.17, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

FCFAX vs. FSMEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Frost Credit Fund (FCFAX) and Fidelity Select Medical Technology and Devices Portfolio (FSMEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FCFAX:

1.99

FSMEX:

0.24

Sortino Ratio

FCFAX:

2.95

FSMEX:

0.36

Omega Ratio

FCFAX:

1.41

FSMEX:

1.05

Calmar Ratio

FCFAX:

2.04

FSMEX:

0.11

Martin Ratio

FCFAX:

7.72

FSMEX:

0.53

Ulcer Index

FCFAX:

0.74%

FSMEX:

5.79%

Daily Std Dev

FCFAX:

2.87%

FSMEX:

19.72%

Max Drawdown

FCFAX:

-16.33%

FSMEX:

-40.34%

Current Drawdown

FCFAX:

-0.81%

FSMEX:

-20.97%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCFAX achieves a 1.17% return, which is significantly higher than FSMEX's -1.63% return. Over the past 10 years, FCFAX has underperformed FSMEX with an annualized return of 4.37%, while FSMEX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.22% annualized return.


FCFAX

YTD

1.17%

1M

0.54%

6M

0.78%

1Y

5.56%

3Y*

6.12%

5Y*

5.73%

10Y*

4.37%

FSMEX

YTD

-1.63%

1M

1.87%

6M

-5.18%

1Y

4.61%

3Y*

3.36%

5Y*

5.13%

10Y*

10.22%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Frost Credit Fund

FCFAX vs. FSMEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCFAX has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than FSMEX's 0.68% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FCFAX vs. FSMEX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCFAX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FCFAX is 9191
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FCFAX is 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FCFAX is 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FCFAX is 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FCFAX is 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FCFAX is 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

FSMEX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FSMEX is 1919
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FSMEX is 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FSMEX is 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FSMEX is 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FSMEX is 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FSMEX is 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FCFAX vs. FSMEX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Frost Credit Fund (FCFAX) and Fidelity Select Medical Technology and Devices Portfolio (FSMEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current FCFAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is higher than the FSMEX Sharpe Ratio of 0.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCFAX and FSMEX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

FCFAX vs. FSMEX - Dividend Comparison

FCFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.39%, less than FSMEX's 10.64% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FCFAX
Frost Credit Fund
5.39%5.79%5.95%4.99%3.66%3.70%4.63%5.05%5.88%4.85%4.96%5.26%
FSMEX
Fidelity Select Medical Technology and Devices Portfolio
10.64%9.58%0.00%1.80%8.12%6.65%1.77%7.47%6.26%5.84%16.35%15.54%

Drawdowns

FCFAX vs. FSMEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCFAX drawdown since its inception was -16.33%, smaller than the maximum FSMEX drawdown of -40.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCFAX and FSMEX.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

FCFAX vs. FSMEX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Frost Credit Fund (FCFAX) is 0.88%, while Fidelity Select Medical Technology and Devices Portfolio (FSMEX) has a volatility of 5.55%. This indicates that FCFAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSMEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...