PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCFAX vs. FPURX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCFAX vs. FPURX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Frost Credit Fund (FCFAX) and Fidelity Puritan Fund (FPURX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCFAX achieves a 1.47% return, which is significantly lower than FPURX's 9.76% return. Over the past 10 years, FCFAX has underperformed FPURX with an annualized return of 5.21%, while FPURX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.49% annualized return.


FCFAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.51%
YTD
1.47%
6M
1.33%
1Y
5.23%
3Y*
7.27%
5Y*
3.83%
10Y*
5.21%

FPURX

1D
0.18%
1M
3.49%
YTD
9.76%
6M
10.38%
1Y
23.43%
3Y*
17.11%
5Y*
9.44%
10Y*
11.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCFAX vs. FPURX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCFAX
Frost Credit Fund
1.47%5.21%8.01%11.23%-7.83%5.07%6.22%6.95%0.89%7.95%
FPURX
Fidelity Puritan Fund
9.76%12.22%18.94%20.20%-17.35%18.92%20.58%21.27%-4.18%18.28%

Correlation

The correlation between FCFAX and FPURX is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013

0.24

Over the past year, FCFAX and FPURX have become more correlated (0.44) than their long-term average of 0.24, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCFAX vs. FPURX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCFAX
FCFAX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
FCFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
FCFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

FPURX
FPURX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
FPURX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FPURX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
FPURX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
FPURX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
FPURX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCFAX vs. FPURX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Frost Credit Fund (FCFAX) and Fidelity Puritan Fund (FPURX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FCFAXFPURXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.23

2.46

-0.24

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.40

3.39

0.00

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.46

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.88

3.31

-0.44

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.78

14.79

-4.01

FCFAX vs. FPURX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCFAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.23, which is comparable to the FPURX Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCFAX and FPURX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FCFAXFPURXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.23

2.46

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.39

0.71

+0.68

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.61

0.88

+0.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.45

0.73

+0.72

Drawdowns

FCFAX vs. FPURX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCFAX drawdown since its inception was -16.33%, smaller than the maximum FPURX drawdown of -31.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCFAX and FPURX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCFAXFPURXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.33%

-31.76%

+15.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.82%

-7.24%

+5.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.82%

-16.51%

+13.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.49%

-22.53%

+12.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.33%

-23.93%

+7.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.53%

-4.65%

+3.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.49%

1.62%

-1.13%

Volatility

FCFAX vs. FPURX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Frost Credit Fund (FCFAX) is 0.81%, while Fidelity Puritan Fund (FPURX) has a volatility of 3.21%. This indicates that FCFAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FPURX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCFAXFPURXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.81%

3.21%

-2.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.74%

7.81%

-6.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.26%

9.77%

-7.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.76%

13.28%

-10.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.24%

13.10%

-9.86%

FCFAX vs. FPURX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCFAX has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than FPURX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCFAX vs. FPURX - Dividend Comparison

FCFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.16%, which matches FPURX's 6.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCFAX
Frost Credit Fund
6.16%6.10%5.76%5.93%5.00%3.65%3.69%4.62%5.05%5.85%4.84%4.95%
FPURX
Fidelity Puritan Fund
6.22%6.83%11.30%5.34%9.38%13.10%5.10%4.29%15.26%3.78%3.71%7.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCFAX and FPURX have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FPURX has higher volatility (3.21%) compared to FCFAX (0.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCFAX dropped -16.33% vs FPURX's -31.76%.

FPURX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 2.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCFAX and FPURX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer