RCLO vs. BLST

Last updated Jul 30, 2026

RCLO (Reckoner BBB-B CLO ETF) and BLST (Bluemonte Short Term Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RCLO is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by Reckoner, while BLST is a Short-Term Bond fund actively managed by Bluemonte. Both are actively managed. Their 0.13 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. RCLO charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.23%/yr for BLST.

Performance

RCLO vs. BLST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Reckoner BBB-B CLO ETF (RCLO) and Bluemonte Short Term Bond ETF (BLST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RCLO achieves a 2.56% return, which is significantly higher than BLST's 0.23% return.

RCLO

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: 0.35%
• 6M: 1.75%
• YTD: 2.56%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

BLST

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: -0.54%
• 6M: 0.13%
• YTD: 0.23%
• 1Y: 2.70%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 2.65%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BLST Bluemonte Short Term Bond ETF	$246.66K	$341.10K	$409.30K
RCLO Reckoner BBB-B CLO ETF	$21.96K	$31.03K	$123.31K

RCLO vs. BLST - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RCLO Reckoner BBB-B CLO ETF	2.56%	1.39%
BLST Bluemonte Short Term Bond ETF	0.23%	0.31%

Correlation

The correlation between RCLO and BLST is 0.13, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2025	0.13

Return for Risk

RCLO vs. BLST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RCLO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BLST

BLST Risk / Return Rank: 49
BLST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
BLST Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
BLST Omega Ratio Rank: 49
BLST Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
BLST Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RCLO vs. BLST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Reckoner BBB-B CLO ETF (RCLO) and Bluemonte Short Term Bond ETF (BLST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RCLO	BLST	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.21	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.80	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.21	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.61	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	4.51	—

Drawdowns

RCLO vs. BLST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RCLO drawdown since its inception was -3.70%, which is greater than BLST's maximum drawdown of -1.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RCLO and BLST.

Drawdown Indicators

	RCLO	BLST	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.70%	-1.69%	-2.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-1.69%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.94%	+0.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.42%	-0.41%	-0.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.60%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RCLO	BLST	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.66%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	1.79%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.87%	2.26%	+0.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.87%	2.26%	+0.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.87%	2.26%	+0.61%

RCLO vs. BLST - Expense Ratio Comparison

RCLO has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than BLST's 0.23% expense ratio.

Dividends

RCLO vs. BLST - Dividend Comparison

RCLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.72%, more than BLST's 4.05% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
BLST Bluemonte Short Term Bond ETF	4.05%	2.11%
RCLO Reckoner BBB-B CLO ETF	4.72%	1.32%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RCLO and BLST in my portfolio?

RCLO and BLST have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RCLO or BLST?

On fees, BLST is cheaper at 0.23% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RCLO or BLST?

BLST is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for RCLO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RCLO or BLST?

RCLO has the higher dividend yield at 4.72%, compared with 4.05% for BLST.

What is the main difference between RCLO and BLST?

RCLO is categorized as Actively Managed, while BLST is Short-Term Bond. They also come from different issuers: Reckoner and Bluemonte. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for RCLO and 0.23% for BLST.