RCLO vs. TACN

Last updated Jul 30, 2026

RCLO (Reckoner BBB-B CLO ETF) and TACN (T. Rowe Price Active Core International Equity ETF) are both Actively Managed funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.16 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. RCLO charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for TACN.

Performance

RCLO vs. TACN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Reckoner BBB-B CLO ETF (RCLO) and T. Rowe Price Active Core International Equity ETF (TACN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RCLO achieves a 2.56% return, which is significantly lower than TACN's 10.54% return.

RCLO

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: 0.35%
• 6M: 1.75%
• YTD: 2.56%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

TACN

• 1D: -0.46%
• 1M: 0.08%
• 6M: 4.64%
• YTD: 10.54%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
RCLO Reckoner BBB-B CLO ETF	$21.96K	$31.03K	$123.31K
TACN T. Rowe Price Active Core International Equity ETF	$184.69K	$112.68K	$82.44K

RCLO vs. TACN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RCLO Reckoner BBB-B CLO ETF	2.56%	0.66%
TACN T. Rowe Price Active Core International Equity ETF	10.54%	1.68%

Correlation

The correlation between RCLO and TACN is 0.16, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025	0.16

Return for Risk

RCLO vs. TACN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Reckoner BBB-B CLO ETF (RCLO) and T. Rowe Price Active Core International Equity ETF (TACN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

RCLO vs. TACN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RCLO drawdown since its inception was -3.70%, smaller than the maximum TACN drawdown of -10.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RCLO and TACN.

Drawdown Indicators

	RCLO	TACN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.70%	-10.98%	+7.28%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.53%	+1.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.42%	-2.32%	+1.90%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RCLO	TACN	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.87%	17.14%	-14.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.87%	17.14%	-14.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.87%	17.14%	-14.27%

RCLO vs. TACN - Expense Ratio Comparison

RCLO has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than TACN's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

RCLO vs. TACN - Dividend Comparison

RCLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.72%, while TACN has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
RCLO Reckoner BBB-B CLO ETF	4.72%	1.32%
TACN T. Rowe Price Active Core International Equity ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RCLO and TACN in my portfolio?

RCLO and TACN have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RCLO or TACN?

On fees, TACN is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RCLO or TACN?

TACN is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for RCLO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RCLO or TACN?

RCLO has the higher dividend yield at 4.72%, compared with 0.00% for TACN.

What is the main difference between RCLO and TACN?

They also come from different issuers: Reckoner and T. Rowe Price. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for RCLO and 0.20% for TACN.