RCL vs. FDIS
RCL (Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd.) is a stock, while FDIS (Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF) is Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Consumer Discretionary Index. Over the past 10 years, RCL returned 16.48%/yr vs 13.98%/yr for FDIS. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
RCL vs. FDIS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RCL achieves a 6.66% return, which is significantly higher than FDIS's 0.01% return. Over the past 10 years, RCL has outperformed FDIS with an annualized return of 16.48%, while FDIS has yielded a comparatively lower 13.98% annualized return.
RCL
- 1D
- 2.23%
- 1M
- 13.68%
- YTD
- 6.66%
- 6M
- 7.04%
- 1Y
- 16.02%
- 3Y*
- 46.74%
- 5Y*
- 27.43%
- 10Y*
- 16.48%
FDIS
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 2.10%
- YTD
- 0.01%
- 6M
- -1.14%
- 1Y
- 12.39%
- 3Y*
- 13.37%
- 5Y*
- 6.04%
- 10Y*
- 13.98%
RCL vs. FDIS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RCL Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. | 6.66% | 22.46% | 78.98% | 161.97% | -35.72% | 2.96% | -43.50% | 39.94% | -16.13% | 48.22% |
FDIS Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF | 0.01% | 5.67% | 24.43% | 40.48% | -35.23% | 24.25% | 49.50% | 27.44% | -0.88% | 22.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between RCL and FDIS is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2013 | 0.55 |
The correlation between RCL and FDIS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RCL vs. FDIS — Risk / Return Rank
RCL
FDIS
RCL vs. FDIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. (RCL) and Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RCL | FDIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.11 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.39 | 0.72 | -0.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.66 | 2.24 | -1.57 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RCL vs. FDIS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RCL drawdown since its inception was -89.49%, which is greater than FDIS's maximum drawdown of -39.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RCL and FDIS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RCL | FDIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.49% | -39.16% | -50.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.36% | -15.50% | -16.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.02% | -27.43% | -7.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -67.64% | -39.16% | -28.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -83.30% | -39.16% | -44.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.16% | -4.58% | -13.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.76% | -7.49% | -20.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.15% | 5.01% | +14.14% |
Volatility
RCL vs. FDIS - Volatility Comparison
Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. (RCL) has a higher volatility of 14.15% compared to Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) at 6.19%. This indicates that RCL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RCL | FDIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.15% | 6.19% | +7.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.00% | 13.44% | +24.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.50% | 18.52% | +27.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 48.52% | 23.92% | +24.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 53.35% | 22.32% | +31.03% |
Dividends
RCL vs. FDIS - Dividend Comparison
RCL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%, more than FDIS's 0.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDIS Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF | 0.73% | 0.75% | 0.69% | 0.78% | 1.00% | 0.58% | 0.59% | 1.14% | 1.29% | 1.00% | 1.62% | 1.25% |
RCL Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. | 1.70% | 1.25% | 0.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.04% | 2.22% | 2.66% | 1.81% | 2.08% | 1.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RCL and FDIS have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RCL has higher volatility (14.15%) compared to FDIS (6.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RCL dropped -89.49% vs FDIS's -39.16%.
FDIS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.61 vs 0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RCL and FDIS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer