RBOT.TO vs. EGLN.L
RBOT.TO (Global X Robotics & AI Index ETF) and EGLN.L (iShares Physical Gold ETC) are both exchange-traded funds - RBOT.TO is a Robotics fund tracking the Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index, while EGLN.L is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, RBOT.TO returned -0.36%/yr vs 20.83%/yr for EGLN.L. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RBOT.TO charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for EGLN.L.
Performance
RBOT.TO vs. EGLN.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
RBOT.TO is traded in CAD, while EGLN.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the EGLN.L values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RBOT.TO achieves a 1.60% return, which is significantly higher than EGLN.L's -0.29% return.
RBOT.TO
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- -8.02%
- YTD
- 1.60%
- 6M
- 1.35%
- 1Y
- 17.52%
- 3Y*
- 6.63%
- 5Y*
- -0.36%
- 10Y*
- —
EGLN.L
- 1D
- 2.92%
- 1M
- -5.63%
- YTD
- -0.29%
- 6M
- -0.25%
- 1Y
- 26.43%
- 3Y*
- 31.17%
- 5Y*
- 20.83%
- 10Y*
- 12.08%
RBOT.TO vs. EGLN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RBOT.TO Global X Robotics & AI Index ETF | 1.60% | 8.45% | 13.13% | 36.79% | -43.99% | 8.06% | 48.18% | 28.47% | -26.43% | -3.76% |
EGLN.L iShares Physical Gold ETC | -0.29% | 58.06% | 36.68% | 10.14% | 5.95% | -3.28% | 20.81% | 13.37% | 6.85% | -0.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between RBOT.TO and EGLN.L is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 29, 2017 | 0.06 |
The correlation between RBOT.TO and EGLN.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (all time) to 0.23 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RBOT.TO vs. EGLN.L — Risk / Return Rank
RBOT.TO
EGLN.L
RBOT.TO vs. EGLN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Robotics & AI Index ETF (RBOT.TO) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (EGLN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RBOT.TO | EGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.21 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.91 | 1.27 | -0.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.88 | 3.77 | -0.89 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RBOT.TO vs. EGLN.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RBOT.TO drawdown since its inception was -56.86%, which is greater than EGLN.L's maximum drawdown of -45.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBOT.TO and EGLN.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RBOT.TO | EGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.86% | -45.11% | -11.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.78% | -21.11% | +2.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.18% | -21.11% | -9.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.86% | -21.11% | -35.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -25.47% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.11% | -18.81% | +4.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.60% | -21.82% | +0.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.91% | 7.13% | -1.22% |
Volatility
RBOT.TO vs. EGLN.L - Volatility Comparison
Global X Robotics & AI Index ETF (RBOT.TO) has a higher volatility of 9.18% compared to iShares Physical Gold ETC (EGLN.L) at 7.33%. This indicates that RBOT.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EGLN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RBOT.TO | EGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.18% | 7.33% | +1.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.90% | 21.37% | -2.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.31% | 24.67% | -0.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.67% | 19.15% | +6.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.95% | 18.12% | +6.83% |
RBOT.TO vs. EGLN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
RBOT.TO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than EGLN.L's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
RBOT.TO vs. EGLN.L - Dividend Comparison
RBOT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, while EGLN.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EGLN.L iShares Physical Gold ETC | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RBOT.TO Global X Robotics & AI Index ETF | 0.13% | 0.14% | 0.85% | 0.11% | 0.52% | 0.04% | 0.17% | 0.67% | 0.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RBOT.TO and EGLN.L have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EGLN.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EGLN.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for RBOT.TO.
RBOT.TO is categorized as Robotics, while EGLN.L is Gold. RBOT.TO tracks Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index, while EGLN.L tracks LBMA Gold Price. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for RBOT.TO and 0.25% for EGLN.L.
Find the right allocation for RBOT.TO and EGLN.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer