PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
RBOT.TO vs. CNX1.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

RBOT.TO vs. CNX1.L

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Robotics & AI Index ETF (RBOT.TO) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CNX1.L).

RBOT.TO and CNX1.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RBOT.TO is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. It was launched on Nov 28, 2017. CNX1.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Jan 26, 2010. Both RBOT.TO and CNX1.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

RBOT.TO vs. CNX1.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Robotics & AI Index ETF (RBOT.TO) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CNX1.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

RBOT.TO vs. CNX1.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RBOT.TO
Global X Robotics & AI Index ETF		-6.83%8.45%13.12%36.79%-43.99%8.06%48.18%28.46%-26.43%-1.50%
CNX1.L
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)		-4.09%14.48%37.23%52.07%-28.75%27.16%45.14%32.15%7.07%0.22%
Different Trading Currencies

RBOT.TO is traded in CAD, while CNX1.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CNX1.L values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RBOT.TO achieves a -6.83% return, which is significantly lower than CNX1.L's -4.09% return.

RBOT.TO

1D
2.82%
1M
-10.98%
YTD
-6.83%
6M
-5.53%
1Y
17.30%
3Y*
8.34%
5Y*
-1.46%
10Y*
—

CNX1.L

1D
2.88%
1M
-1.76%
YTD
-4.09%
6M
-2.62%
1Y
20.95%
3Y*
24.28%
5Y*
15.34%
10Y*
19.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Global X Robotics & AI Index ETF

iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)

Often compared with RBOT.TO:
RBOT.TO vs. XAIXRBOT.TO vs. ROBORBOT.TO vs. AIGO.TORBOT.TO vs. AIQRBOT.TO vs. FBOTRBOT.TO vs. VOORBOT.TO vs. LSMC.DE
Often compared with CNX1.L:
CNX1.L vs. CNDX.LCNX1.L vs. EQQQ.LCNX1.L vs. IITU.LCNX1.L vs. EQGB.LCNX1.L vs. QQQCNX1.L vs. XNAQ.LCNX1.L vs. SXRV.DE

RBOT.TO vs. CNX1.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

RBOT.TO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than CNX1.L's 0.36% expense ratio.

RBOT.TO
Global X Robotics & AI Index ETF
CNX1.L
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)

Return for Risk

RBOT.TO vs. CNX1.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
RBOT.TO
RBOT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
RBOT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RBOT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
RBOT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
RBOT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
RBOT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
CNX1.L
CNX1.L Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
CNX1.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNX1.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNX1.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
CNX1.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNX1.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RBOT.TO vs. CNX1.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Robotics & AI Index ETF (RBOT.TO) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CNX1.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

RBOT.TOCNX1.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.64

1.02

-0.38

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.13

1.51

-0.39

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.21

-0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.92

1.80

-0.88

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.20

5.46

-2.26

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RBOT.TO vs. CNX1.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RBOT.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is lower than the CNX1.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RBOT.TO and CNX1.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

RBOT.TOCNX1.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

1.02

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.06

0.79

-0.85

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

1.03

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.13

1.17

-1.04

Correlation

The correlation between RBOT.TO and CNX1.L is 0.49, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

RBOT.TO vs. CNX1.L - Dividend Comparison

RBOT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%, while CNX1.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
RBOT.TO
Global X Robotics & AI Index ETF		0.15%0.14%0.85%0.11%0.52%0.04%0.17%0.67%0.15%
CNX1.L
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

RBOT.TO vs. CNX1.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RBOT.TO drawdown since its inception was -56.86%, which is greater than CNX1.L's maximum drawdown of -31.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBOT.TO and CNX1.L.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

RBOT.TOCNX1.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.86%

-27.56%

-29.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.78%

-11.03%

-7.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.86%

-27.56%

-29.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-27.56%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.24%

-8.21%

-13.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.83%

-4.61%

-17.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.42%

3.68%

+1.74%

Volatility

RBOT.TO vs. CNX1.L - Volatility Comparison

Global X Robotics & AI Index ETF (RBOT.TO) has a higher volatility of 7.97% compared to iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CNX1.L) at 5.37%. This indicates that RBOT.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CNX1.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

RBOT.TOCNX1.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.97%

5.37%

+2.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.68%

11.85%

+4.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.17%

20.50%

+6.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.22%

19.44%

+5.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.78%

19.00%

+5.78%