RBOT.TO vs. FBOT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

RBOT.TO (Global X Robotics & AI Index ETF) and FBOT (Fidelity Disruptive Automation ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RBOT.TO is a Robotics fund tracking the Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index, while FBOT is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity. RBOT.TO is passively managed, while FBOT is actively managed. Over the past year, RBOT.TO returned 25.99% vs 41.69% for FBOT. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RBOT.TO charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for FBOT.

Performance

RBOT.TO vs. FBOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Robotics & AI Index ETF (RBOT.TO) and Fidelity Disruptive Automation ETF (FBOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

RBOT.TO is traded in CAD, while FBOT is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FBOT values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RBOT.TO achieves a 9.74% return, which is significantly lower than FBOT's 21.59% return.

RBOT.TO

• 1D: -1.02%
• 1M: 4.73%
• YTD: 9.74%
• 6M: 12.67%
• 1Y: 25.99%
• 3Y*: 10.69%
• 5Y*: 1.19%
• 10Y*: —

FBOT

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: 7.63%
• YTD: 21.59%
• 6M: 21.42%
• 1Y: 41.69%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RBOT.TO vs. FBOT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
RBOT.TO Global X Robotics & AI Index ETF	9.74%	8.45%	13.12%	-0.71%
FBOT Fidelity Disruptive Automation ETF	21.59%	13.69%	22.25%	-1.95%

Correlation

The correlation between RBOT.TO and FBOT is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2023	0.74

The correlation between RBOT.TO and FBOT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

RBOT.TO vs. FBOT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RBOT.TO	FBOT
Industrials	49.0%	51.0%
Technology	29.4%	37.5%
Healthcare	9.4%	0.9%
Consumer Cyclical	7.0%	6.3%
Communication Services	5.2%	4.2%
Financial Services	1.0%	-
Energy	0.5%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

RBOT.TO vs. FBOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RBOT.TO

RBOT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 30
RBOT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
RBOT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
RBOT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 29
RBOT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
RBOT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 31

FBOT

FBOT Risk / Return Rank: 56
FBOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
FBOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
FBOT Omega Ratio Rank: 54
FBOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
FBOT Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RBOT.TO vs. FBOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Robotics & AI Index ETF (RBOT.TO) and Fidelity Disruptive Automation ETF (FBOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RBOT.TO	FBOT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.12	2.15	-1.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.72	2.91	-1.18
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.37	-0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.39	3.08	-1.69
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.56	10.97	-6.41
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RBOT.TO vs. FBOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RBOT.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is lower than the FBOT Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RBOT.TO and FBOT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RBOT.TO	FBOT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.12	2.15	-1.03
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.05	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.21	0.94	-0.73

Drawdowns

RBOT.TO vs. FBOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RBOT.TO drawdown since its inception was -56.86%, which is greater than FBOT's maximum drawdown of -24.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBOT.TO and FBOT.

Drawdown Indicators

	RBOT.TO	FBOT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.86%	-24.03%	-32.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.78%	-13.62%	-5.16%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-30.18%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-56.86%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.23%	0.00%	-7.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.62%	-4.93%	-16.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.71%	3.81%	+1.90%

Volatility

RBOT.TO vs. FBOT - Volatility Comparison

Global X Robotics & AI Index ETF (RBOT.TO) has a higher volatility of 8.42% compared to Fidelity Disruptive Automation ETF (FBOT) at 5.58%. This indicates that RBOT.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RBOT.TO	FBOT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.42%	5.58%	+2.84%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.89%	15.37%	+2.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.33%	19.51%	+3.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.53%	19.75%	+5.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.89%	19.75%	+5.14%

RBOT.TO vs. FBOT - Expense Ratio Comparison

RBOT.TO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than FBOT's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

RBOT.TO vs. FBOT - Dividend Comparison

RBOT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, less than FBOT's 0.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FBOT Fidelity Disruptive Automation ETF	0.59%	0.81%	0.31%	0.20%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RBOT.TO Global X Robotics & AI Index ETF	0.12%	0.14%	0.85%	0.11%	0.52%	0.04%	0.17%	0.67%	0.15%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RBOT.TO and FBOT in my portfolio?

RBOT.TO and FBOT have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RBOT.TO or FBOT?

On fees, FBOT is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RBOT.TO or FBOT?

FBOT is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for RBOT.TO.

What is the main difference between RBOT.TO and FBOT?

RBOT.TO is categorized as Robotics, while FBOT is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for RBOT.TO and 0.50% for FBOT.