PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RBLY vs. GDXW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RBLY vs. GDXW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax RBLX Option Income Strategy ETF (RBLY) and Roundhill Gold Miners Weeklypay ETF (GDXW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RBLY achieves a -45.56% return, which is significantly lower than GDXW's -4.89% return.


RBLY

1D
-1.83%
1M
-8.47%
YTD
-45.56%
6M
-50.91%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GDXW

1D
-4.02%
1M
-1.27%
YTD
-4.89%
6M
2.36%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RBLY vs. GDXW - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between RBLY and GDXW is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2025

0.17

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RBLY vs. GDXW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax RBLX Option Income Strategy ETF (RBLY) and Roundhill Gold Miners Weeklypay ETF (GDXW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

RBLY vs. GDXW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RBLYGDXWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-1.25

0.45

-1.70

Drawdowns

RBLY vs. GDXW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RBLY drawdown since its inception was -65.81%, which is greater than GDXW's maximum drawdown of -36.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBLY and GDXW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RBLYGDXWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.81%

-36.83%

-28.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-65.42%

-32.99%

-32.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.05%

-13.45%

-19.60%

Volatility

RBLY vs. GDXW - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RBLYGDXWDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

52.41%

61.39%

-8.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

52.41%

61.39%

-8.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

52.41%

61.39%

-8.98%

RBLY vs. GDXW - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both RBLY and GDXW have an expense ratio of 0.99%.


Dividends

RBLY vs. GDXW - Dividend Comparison

RBLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 127.58%, more than GDXW's 39.39% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


RBLY and GDXW have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

RBLY and GDXW have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

RBLY has the higher dividend yield at 127.58%, compared with 39.39% for GDXW.

RBLY is categorized as Derivative Income, while GDXW is Gold. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Roundhill.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RBLY and GDXW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer