PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RBLY vs. SMCY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RBLY vs. SMCY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax RBLX Option Income Strategy ETF (RBLY) and YieldMax SMCI Option Income Strategy ETF (SMCY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RBLY achieves a -55.31% return, which is significantly lower than SMCY's -10.43% return.


RBLY

1D
-24.81%
1M
-31.51%
6M
-44.86%
YTD
-55.31%
1Y
-68.34%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-66.93%

SMCY

1D
2.27%
1M
3.11%
6M
-9.99%
YTD
-10.43%
1Y
-48.73%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-30.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$212.05K$224.38K$157.63K
$4.23M$3.64M$6.33M

RBLY vs. SMCY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between RBLY and SMCY is 0.20, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2025

0.20

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RBLY vs. SMCY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RBLY
RBLY Risk / Return Rank: 00
Overall Rank
RBLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RBLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
RBLY Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
RBLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
RBLY Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank

SMCY
SMCY Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
SMCY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMCY Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMCY Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
SMCY Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMCY Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RBLY vs. SMCY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax RBLX Option Income Strategy ETF (RBLY) and YieldMax SMCI Option Income Strategy ETF (SMCY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RBLYSMCYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.71

0.90

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.99

-0.85

-0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.62

-1.32

-0.30

RBLY vs. SMCY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RBLY Sharpe Ratio is -1.23, which is lower than the SMCY Sharpe Ratio of -0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RBLY and SMCY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RBLY vs. SMCY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RBLY drawdown since its inception was -71.61%, which is greater than SMCY's maximum drawdown of -64.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBLY and SMCY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RBLYSMCYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.61%

-64.75%

-6.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-71.61%

-59.21%

-12.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-71.61%

-56.82%

-14.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.44%

-38.39%

+0.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

43.79%

38.68%

+5.11%

Volatility

RBLY vs. SMCY - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax RBLX Option Income Strategy ETF (RBLY) has a higher volatility of 30.27% compared to YieldMax SMCI Option Income Strategy ETF (SMCY) at 23.42%. This indicates that RBLY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMCY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RBLYSMCYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

30.27%

23.42%

+6.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

50.88%

70.65%

-19.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

58.64%

75.26%

-16.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

58.66%

80.52%

-21.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

58.66%

80.52%

-21.86%

RBLY vs. SMCY - Expense Ratio Comparison

RBLY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than SMCY's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

RBLY vs. SMCY - Dividend Comparison

RBLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 197.07%, more than SMCY's 180.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
RBLY
YieldMax RBLX Option Income Strategy ETF
197.07%36.84%0.00%
SMCY
YieldMax SMCI Option Income Strategy ETF
180.05%231.43%38.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


RBLY and SMCY have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RBLY has higher volatility (30.27%) compared to SMCY (23.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RBLY dropped -71.61% vs SMCY's -64.75%.

On 1-year performance, SMCY leads with -48.73% vs -68.34% for RBLY. On fees, RBLY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, SMCY has been the lower-risk option at 23.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SMCY has performed better with a -48.73% return vs -68.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RBLY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for SMCY.

RBLY has the higher dividend yield at 197.07%, compared with 180.05% for SMCY.

Their fees differ too: 0.99% for RBLY and 1.01% for SMCY.

SMCY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.67 vs -1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RBLY and SMCY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer