PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RBLY vs. DIVO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RBLY vs. DIVO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax RBLX Option Income Strategy ETF (RBLY) and Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RBLY achieves a -55.31% return, which is significantly lower than DIVO's 8.38% return.


RBLY

1D
-24.81%
1M
-31.51%
6M
-44.86%
YTD
-55.31%
1Y
-68.34%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-66.93%

DIVO

1D
-0.02%
1M
1.40%
6M
5.32%
YTD
8.38%
1Y
18.15%
3Y*
14.53%
5Y*
10.70%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$39.08M$36.10M$38.51M
$212.05K$224.38K$157.63K

RBLY vs. DIVO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between RBLY and DIVO is 0.16, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2025

0.15

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RBLY vs. DIVO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RBLY
RBLY Risk / Return Rank: 00
Overall Rank
RBLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RBLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
RBLY Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
RBLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
RBLY Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank

DIVO
DIVO Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
DIVO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIVO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIVO Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
DIVO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIVO Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RBLY vs. DIVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax RBLX Option Income Strategy ETF (RBLY) and Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RBLYDIVODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.71

1.33

-0.62

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.99

2.90

-3.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.62

10.27

-11.88

RBLY vs. DIVO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RBLY Sharpe Ratio is -1.23, which is lower than the DIVO Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RBLY and DIVO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RBLY vs. DIVO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RBLY drawdown since its inception was -71.61%, which is greater than DIVO's maximum drawdown of -30.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBLY and DIVO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RBLYDIVODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.61%

-30.04%

-41.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-71.61%

-5.95%

-65.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-71.61%

-0.17%

-71.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.44%

-2.58%

-34.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

43.79%

1.68%

+42.11%

Volatility

RBLY vs. DIVO - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax RBLX Option Income Strategy ETF (RBLY) has a higher volatility of 30.27% compared to Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO) at 2.86%. This indicates that RBLY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DIVO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RBLYDIVODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

30.27%

2.86%

+27.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

50.88%

7.22%

+43.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

58.64%

9.32%

+49.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

58.66%

11.91%

+46.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

58.66%

14.77%

+43.89%

RBLY vs. DIVO - Expense Ratio Comparison

RBLY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than DIVO's 0.56% expense ratio.


Dividends

RBLY vs. DIVO - Dividend Comparison

RBLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 197.07%, more than DIVO's 6.37% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
DIVO
Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF
6.37%6.44%4.70%4.67%4.76%4.79%4.91%8.16%5.27%3.83%
RBLY
YieldMax RBLX Option Income Strategy ETF
197.07%36.84%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RBLY and DIVO have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RBLY has higher volatility (30.27%) compared to DIVO (2.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RBLY dropped -71.61% vs DIVO's -30.04%.

On 1-year performance, DIVO leads with 18.15% vs -68.34% for RBLY. On fees, DIVO is cheaper at 0.56% per year. On volatility, DIVO has been the lower-risk option at 2.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DIVO has performed better with a 18.15% return vs -68.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DIVO is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for RBLY.

RBLY has the higher dividend yield at 197.07%, compared with 6.37% for DIVO.

They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for RBLY and 0.56% for DIVO.

DIVO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs -1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RBLY and DIVO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer