RBLY vs. LQTI

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

RBLY (YieldMax RBLX Option Income Strategy ETF) and LQTI (FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, RBLY returned -68.97% vs 2.09% for LQTI. Their 0.12 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. RBLY charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for LQTI.

Performance

RBLY vs. LQTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax RBLX Option Income Strategy ETF (RBLY) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RBLY achieves a -54.42% return, which is significantly lower than LQTI's -0.64% return.

RBLY

• 1D: 0.90%
• 1M: -30.15%
• 6M: -43.26%
• YTD: -54.42%
• 1Y: -68.97%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -65.87%

LQTI

• 1D: 0.80%
• 1M: -1.29%
• 6M: -0.79%
• YTD: -0.64%
• 1Y: 2.09%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 3.98%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF	$2.10M	$2.20M	$1.68M
RBLY YieldMax RBLX Option Income Strategy ETF	$189.93K	$215.88K	$158.18K

RBLY vs. LQTI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RBLY YieldMax RBLX Option Income Strategy ETF	-54.42%	-26.39%
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF	-0.64%	3.87%

Correlation

The correlation between RBLY and LQTI is 0.15, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.15
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2025	0.12

Return for Risk

RBLY vs. LQTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RBLY

RBLY Risk / Return Rank: 0
RBLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
RBLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
RBLY Omega Ratio Rank: 0
RBLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
RBLY Martin Ratio Rank: 1

LQTI

LQTI Risk / Return Rank: 18
LQTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
LQTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
LQTI Omega Ratio Rank: 16
LQTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
LQTI Martin Ratio Rank: 21

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RBLY vs. LQTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax RBLX Option Income Strategy ETF (RBLY) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RBLY	LQTI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.21	0.40	-1.61
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-2.11	0.60	-2.71
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.72	1.07	-0.35
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.97	0.62	-1.58
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.56	1.54	-3.10

RBLY vs. LQTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RBLY Sharpe Ratio is -1.21, which is lower than the LQTI Sharpe Ratio of 0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RBLY and LQTI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RBLY vs. LQTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RBLY drawdown since its inception was -71.61%, which is greater than LQTI's maximum drawdown of -3.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBLY and LQTI.

Drawdown Indicators

	RBLY	LQTI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-71.61%	-3.41%	-68.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-71.61%	-3.41%	-68.20%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-71.05%	-2.23%	-68.82%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-37.70%	-0.99%	-36.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	44.22%	1.36%	+42.86%

Volatility

RBLY vs. LQTI - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax RBLX Option Income Strategy ETF (RBLY) has a higher volatility of 30.06% compared to FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI) at 1.67%. This indicates that RBLY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LQTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RBLY	LQTI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	30.06%	1.67%	+28.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	49.36%	4.20%	+45.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	57.31%	5.19%	+52.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	58.46%	5.92%	+52.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	58.46%	5.92%	+52.54%

RBLY vs. LQTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

RBLY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than LQTI's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

RBLY vs. LQTI - Dividend Comparison

RBLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 193.21%, more than LQTI's 9.27% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF	9.27%	7.01%
RBLY YieldMax RBLX Option Income Strategy ETF	193.21%	36.84%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RBLY and LQTI in my portfolio?

RBLY and LQTI have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RBLY or LQTI?

RBLY has higher volatility (30.06%) compared to LQTI (1.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RBLY dropped -71.61% vs LQTI's -3.41%.

Which ETF is better, RBLY or LQTI?

On 1-year performance, LQTI leads with 2.09% vs -68.97% for RBLY. On fees, LQTI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, LQTI has been the lower-risk option at 1.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RBLY or LQTI?

Over the 1-year period, LQTI has performed better with a 2.09% return vs -68.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RBLY or LQTI?

LQTI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for RBLY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RBLY or LQTI?

RBLY has the higher dividend yield at 193.21%, compared with 9.27% for LQTI.

What is the main difference between RBLY and LQTI?

They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for RBLY and 0.65% for LQTI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LQTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.40 vs -1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.