RBLY vs. CDC
RBLY (YieldMax RBLX Option Income Strategy ETF) and CDC (VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RBLY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax, while CDC is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq Victory U.S. Large Cap High Dividend 100 Long/Cash Volatility Weighted Index. RBLY is actively managed, while CDC is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions. RBLY charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.37%/yr for CDC.
Performance
RBLY vs. CDC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RBLY achieves a -40.88% return, which is significantly lower than CDC's 14.10% return.
RBLY
- 1D
- 1.69%
- 1M
- -0.84%
- YTD
- -40.88%
- 6M
- -41.14%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CDC
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 0.92%
- YTD
- 14.10%
- 6M
- 13.32%
- 1Y
- 20.80%
- 3Y*
- 13.02%
- 5Y*
- 6.36%
- 10Y*
- 10.52%
RBLY vs. CDC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RBLY YieldMax RBLX Option Income Strategy ETF | -40.88% | -26.39% |
CDC VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF | 14.10% | 2.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between RBLY and CDC is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2025 | -0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RBLY vs. CDC — Risk / Return Rank
RBLY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CDC
RBLY vs. CDC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax RBLX Option Income Strategy ETF (RBLY) and VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF (CDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RBLY | CDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.36 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.69 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 12.98 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RBLY vs. CDC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RBLY drawdown since its inception was -66.96%, which is greater than CDC's maximum drawdown of -21.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBLY and CDC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RBLY | CDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.96% | -21.37% | -45.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.67% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -12.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.37% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -21.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -62.45% | -0.37% | -62.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.83% | -5.09% | -29.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.61% | — |
Volatility
RBLY vs. CDC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RBLY | CDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.33% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.11% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 52.82% | 9.98% | +42.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 52.82% | 12.52% | +40.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 52.82% | 13.21% | +39.61% |
RBLY vs. CDC - Expense Ratio Comparison
RBLY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than CDC's 0.37% expense ratio.
Dividends
RBLY vs. CDC - Dividend Comparison
RBLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 125.96%, more than CDC's 3.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDC VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF | 3.13% | 3.36% | 3.32% | 4.24% | 3.48% | 2.65% | 2.48% | 3.04% | 3.37% | 2.81% | 2.99% | 3.17% |
RBLY YieldMax RBLX Option Income Strategy ETF | 125.96% | 36.84% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RBLY and CDC have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CDC is cheaper at 0.37% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CDC is cheaper with a 0.37% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for RBLY.
RBLY has the higher dividend yield at 125.96%, compared with 3.13% for CDC.
RBLY is categorized as Derivative Income, while CDC is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Crestview. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for RBLY and 0.37% for CDC.
Find the right allocation for RBLY and CDC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer