RBLVX vs. PALDX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

RBLVX (Russell Investments LifePoints Balanced Strategy Fund) and PALDX (PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 5 years, RBLVX returned 5.74%/yr vs 9.50%/yr for PALDX. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RBLVX charges 0.76%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for PALDX.

Performance

RBLVX vs. PALDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Russell Investments LifePoints Balanced Strategy Fund (RBLVX) and PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RBLVX achieves a 7.15% return, which is significantly lower than PALDX's 7.89% return.

RBLVX

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: 2.44%
• YTD: 7.15%
• 6M: 7.84%
• 1Y: 18.50%
• 3Y*: 12.71%
• 5Y*: 5.74%
• 10Y*: 6.30%

PALDX

• 1D: 0.40%
• 1M: 3.05%
• YTD: 7.89%
• 6M: 8.61%
• 1Y: 21.47%
• 3Y*: 17.10%
• 5Y*: 9.50%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RBLVX vs. PALDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RBLVX Russell Investments LifePoints Balanced Strategy Fund	7.15%	14.63%	8.79%	13.89%	-16.25%	13.34%	4.04%	13.55%	-6.58%	1.89%
PALDX PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund	7.89%	13.62%	18.96%	18.90%	-15.65%	16.30%	10.68%	22.27%	-4.12%	5.95%

Correlation

The correlation between RBLVX and PALDX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.93
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2017	0.87

The correlation between RBLVX and PALDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

RBLVX vs. PALDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RBLVX

RBLVX Risk / Return Rank: 65
RBLVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
RBLVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
RBLVX Omega Ratio Rank: 68
RBLVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
RBLVX Martin Ratio Rank: 63

PALDX

PALDX Risk / Return Rank: 83
PALDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
PALDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
PALDX Omega Ratio Rank: 79
PALDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
PALDX Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RBLVX vs. PALDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Russell Investments LifePoints Balanced Strategy Fund (RBLVX) and PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RBLVX	PALDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.45	2.76	-0.31
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.51	3.95	-0.44
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.52	-0.06
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.80	3.65	-0.85
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	12.39	17.34	-4.95
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RBLVX vs. PALDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RBLVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.45, which is comparable to the PALDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RBLVX and PALDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RBLVX	PALDX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.45	2.76	-0.31
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.55	0.79	-0.24
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.58	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.27	0.81	-0.54

Drawdowns

RBLVX vs. PALDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RBLVX drawdown since its inception was -50.99%, which is greater than PALDX's maximum drawdown of -26.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBLVX and PALDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	RBLVX	PALDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.99%	-26.16%	-24.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.77%	-5.96%	-0.81%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.41%	-16.06%	+5.65%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.67%	-20.47%	-2.20%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-26.42%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.28%	-4.09%	-5.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.53%	1.25%	+0.28%

Volatility

RBLVX vs. PALDX - Volatility Comparison

Russell Investments LifePoints Balanced Strategy Fund (RBLVX) and PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX) have volatilities of 2.39% and 2.29%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RBLVX	PALDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.39%	2.29%	+0.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.20%	6.19%	+0.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.74%	7.91%	-0.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.48%	12.11%	-1.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.85%	12.70%	-1.85%

RBLVX vs. PALDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RBLVX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than PALDX's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

RBLVX vs. PALDX - Dividend Comparison

RBLVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.80%, more than PALDX's 5.02% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PALDX PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund	5.02%	5.42%	10.40%	2.94%	6.19%	6.87%	2.58%	4.58%	3.65%	1.48%	0.00%	0.00%
RBLVX Russell Investments LifePoints Balanced Strategy Fund	6.80%	7.12%	0.98%	1.42%	4.51%	15.03%	1.25%	3.42%	5.98%	5.64%	7.73%	10.09%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RBLVX and PALDX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, RBLVX and PALDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, RBLVX or PALDX?

RBLVX has higher volatility (2.39%) compared to PALDX (2.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RBLVX dropped -50.99% vs PALDX's -26.16%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PALDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.76 vs 2.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.