RBLU vs. GCOW
RBLU (T-Rex 2X Long RBLX Daily Target ETF) and GCOW (Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RBLU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Roblox Corp. Class A (RBLX), while GCOW is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividends Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, RBLU returned -86.95% vs 27.12% for GCOW. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions. RBLU charges 1.05%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for GCOW.
Performance
RBLU vs. GCOW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RBLU achieves a -79.08% return, which is significantly lower than GCOW's 12.18% return.
RBLU
- 1D
- -6.23%
- 1M
- -20.33%
- YTD
- -79.08%
- 6M
- -84.26%
- 1Y
- -86.95%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GCOW
- 1D
- -0.56%
- 1M
- 0.09%
- YTD
- 12.18%
- 6M
- 13.23%
- 1Y
- 27.12%
- 3Y*
- 17.41%
- 5Y*
- 12.34%
- 10Y*
- 9.91%
RBLU vs. GCOW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RBLU T-Rex 2X Long RBLX Daily Target ETF | -79.08% | 16.20% |
GCOW Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF | 12.18% | 18.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between RBLU and GCOW is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2025 | -0.04 |
The correlation between RBLU and GCOW shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to -0.04 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RBLU vs. GCOW — Risk / Return Rank
RBLU
GCOW
RBLU vs. GCOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long RBLX Daily Target ETF (RBLU) and Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RBLU | GCOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.82 | 1.44 | -0.61 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.92 | 5.71 | -6.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.41 | 15.05 | -16.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RBLU | GCOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.73 | 2.52 | -3.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.92 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.61 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.58 | 0.59 | -1.17 |
Drawdowns
RBLU vs. GCOW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RBLU drawdown since its inception was -94.59%, which is greater than GCOW's maximum drawdown of -37.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBLU and GCOW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RBLU | GCOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.59% | -37.64% | -56.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -94.59% | -4.77% | -89.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -12.35% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.48% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.64% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -94.16% | -2.73% | -91.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.88% | -5.84% | -37.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 61.69% | 1.81% | +59.88% |
Volatility
RBLU vs. GCOW - Volatility Comparison
T-Rex 2X Long RBLX Daily Target ETF (RBLU) has a higher volatility of 37.60% compared to Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW) at 2.85%. This indicates that RBLU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GCOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RBLU | GCOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 37.60% | 2.85% | +34.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 99.00% | 7.99% | +91.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 119.35% | 10.81% | +108.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 117.21% | 13.49% | +103.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 117.21% | 16.20% | +101.01% |
RBLU vs. GCOW - Expense Ratio Comparison
RBLU has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than GCOW's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
RBLU vs. GCOW - Dividend Comparison
RBLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.19%, more than GCOW's 4.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GCOW Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF | 4.43% | 4.06% | 5.14% | 5.28% | 4.39% | 4.23% | 4.12% | 4.40% | 3.94% | 2.79% | 1.95% |
RBLU T-Rex 2X Long RBLX Daily Target ETF | 6.19% | 1.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RBLU and GCOW have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RBLU has higher volatility (37.60%) compared to GCOW (2.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RBLU dropped -94.59% vs GCOW's -37.64%.
On 1-year performance, GCOW leads with 27.12% vs -86.95% for RBLU. On fees, GCOW is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, GCOW has been the lower-risk option at 2.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GCOW has performed better with a 27.12% return vs -86.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GCOW is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for RBLU.
RBLU has the higher dividend yield at 6.19%, compared with 4.43% for GCOW.
RBLU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while GCOW is Large Cap Value Equities. RBLU tracks Roblox Corp. Class A (RBLX), while GCOW tracks Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividends Index. They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for RBLU and 0.60% for GCOW.
GCOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs -0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RBLU and GCOW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer