RBLU vs. CRCD

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

RBLU (T-Rex 2X Long RBLX Daily Target ETF) and CRCD (T-REX 2X Inverse CRCL Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RBLU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Roblox Corp. Class A (RBLX), while CRCD is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by T-Rex. RBLU is passively managed, while CRCD is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.32, they often move in opposite directions. RBLU charges 1.05%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for CRCD.

Performance

RBLU vs. CRCD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-Rex 2X Long RBLX Daily Target ETF (RBLU) and T-REX 2X Inverse CRCL Daily Target ETF (CRCD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RBLU achieves a -76.36% return, which is significantly higher than CRCD's -85.83% return.

RBLU

• 1D: -16.28%
• 1M: -7.89%
• YTD: -76.36%
• 6M: -77.14%
• 1Y: -88.46%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CRCD

• 1D: 0.41%
• 1M: 69.10%
• YTD: -85.83%
• 6M: -83.07%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RBLU vs. CRCD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RBLU T-Rex 2X Long RBLX Daily Target ETF	-76.36%	-67.45%
CRCD T-REX 2X Inverse CRCL Daily Target ETF	-85.83%	38.83%

Correlation

The correlation between RBLU and CRCD is -0.32, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2025	-0.32

Return for Risk

RBLU vs. CRCD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RBLU

RBLU Risk / Return Rank: 2
RBLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
RBLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
RBLU Omega Ratio Rank: 1
RBLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
RBLU Martin Ratio Rank: 2

CRCD

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RBLU vs. CRCD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long RBLX Daily Target ETF (RBLU) and T-REX 2X Inverse CRCL Daily Target ETF (CRCD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RBLU	CRCD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.72	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.44	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.82	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.93	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.36	—	—

Drawdowns

RBLU vs. CRCD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RBLU drawdown since its inception was -94.76%, roughly equal to the maximum CRCD drawdown of -96.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBLU and CRCD.

Drawdown Indicators

	RBLU	CRCD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-94.76%	-96.95%	+2.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-94.76%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-93.40%	-93.28%	-0.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-44.62%	-57.11%	+12.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	65.00%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RBLU	CRCD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	37.56%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	102.71%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	123.21%	200.97%	-77.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	118.58%	200.97%	-82.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	118.58%	200.97%	-82.39%

RBLU vs. CRCD - Expense Ratio Comparison

RBLU has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is lower than CRCD's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

RBLU vs. CRCD - Dividend Comparison

RBLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.47%, while CRCD has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
CRCD T-REX 2X Inverse CRCL Daily Target ETF	0.00%	0.00%
RBLU T-Rex 2X Long RBLX Daily Target ETF	5.47%	1.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RBLU and CRCD in my portfolio?

RBLU and CRCD have a correlation of -0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RBLU or CRCD?

On fees, RBLU is cheaper at 1.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RBLU or CRCD?

RBLU is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for CRCD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RBLU or CRCD?

RBLU has the higher dividend yield at 5.47%, compared with 0.00% for CRCD.

What is the main difference between RBLU and CRCD?

RBLU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while CRCD is Inverse Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for RBLU and 1.50% for CRCD.